Note that the fedora voting system exists,

and fix a few wording around that.
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-02-10 16:43:21 -05:00
parent 3ed4440b24
commit 603a7e7d15

16
README
View file

@ -8,11 +8,17 @@ he confirmed that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms
designed for multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential designed for multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential
voting system with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice. voting system with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
Meanwhile, [openstv](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is a Now, if you're looking specifically for
command-line based system that implements all sorts of voting algorithms, but [range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then
it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth noting that openstv has [Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections)
since been taken proprietary, but older versions that were released as Free probably what you want.
Software are still available.)
Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms,
[PpenSTV](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is your best
choice. OpenSTV is a command-line based system that implements all sorts of
voting algorithms, but it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth
noting that openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that
were released as Free Software are still available.)
GNOME Foundation, noticing this, implemented their own little hacked-together GNOME Foundation, noticing this, implemented their own little hacked-together
system to collect votes for their annual Directorship elections, and they system to collect votes for their annual Directorship elections, and they