From 603a7e7d15959d4b1131f3541b3093b556408894 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Bradley M. Kuhn" Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:43:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Note that the fedora voting system exists, and fix a few wording around that. --- README | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index d1616c6..674af1b 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -8,11 +8,17 @@ he confirmed that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential voting system with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice. -Meanwhile, [openstv](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is a -command-line based system that implements all sorts of voting algorithms, but -it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth noting that openstv has -since been taken proprietary, but older versions that were released as Free -Software are still available.) +Now, if you're looking specifically for +[range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then +[Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections) +probably what you want. + +Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms, +[PpenSTV](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is your best +choice. OpenSTV is a command-line based system that implements all sorts of +voting algorithms, but it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth +noting that openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that +were released as Free Software are still available.) GNOME Foundation, noticing this, implemented their own little hacked-together system to collect votes for their annual Directorship elections, and they