Final slides, I think.

They are very wordy, as noted.

index.html

@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
 
 
 
+<section>
+<!-- Next slide -->
 
 <!-- Denver: you can edit above all you want -->
 <!-- bkuhn promises to not work above here -->
@@ -123,10 +125,6 @@
 <!-- NO ONE BUT BKUHN EDIT BELOW YET: -->
 
 
-<section>
-<!-- Next slide -->
-
-
 <h3 class="top-title">Microsoft Acquires GitHub</h3>
 <img src="github-acquired.png" align="right"  />
 <p class="copious" align="left">
@@ -139,8 +137,80 @@
  </p>
   </section>
 
+<section>
+<!-- Next slide -->
+
+<!-- FIXME: denver, karen: if you wanted to include the free CI credits stuff --
+  -- (I talked with karen about this last night), I think that slide would go
+  -- here -->
+
+<h3>Meanwhile, in Copyleft Land &hellip;</h3>
+
+<span class="copious">
+<p>In the late 1990s, it became obvious that the Free Software Foundation USA
+  (FSF USA) was not able to do every possible task for the toolchain
+  projects, which included:
+  <ul><li>Copyright Assignment</li>
+    <li>Appointing Maintainers of key GNU packages</li>
+    <li>Running all infrastructural servers for every GNU project</li>
+    <li>Licensing work (e.g., drafting new versions of the GPL)</li>
+  </ul>
+</p>
+</p>
+
+<p>A compromise was reached, creating the Sourceware project (which years
+  later became an SFC member project).</p>
+</section>
 
 <section>
+<!-- Next slide -->
+
+
+<h3>SourceWare is different</h3>
+<span class="copious">
+<p>Because the project was founded by developers who valued copyleft,
+ Sourceware remains always unwilling to allow for-profit interests influence
+  the hosting.</p>
+
+<p>This resistance by individuals from allowing for-profit control continued
+  &mdash; even though Sourceware's physical servers physically reside in
+  donated rack space from Cygnus (then Red Hat and now IBM).</p>
+  
+<p>Sourceware is admittedly not the infrastructure of choice for folks who
+  don't do low-level C/C++ programming, but it does serve the needs of that
+  community well.</p>
+</span>
+</section>
+
+<section>
+<!-- Next slide -->
+
+<h3>There is some other hope as well!</h3>
+<span class="copious">
+
+<p>Please take a look at the Forejgo project, and the German-based
+  non-profit, Codeberg.</p>
+
+<p>There are many other similar systems, we think Forejgo is strategic
+  because they have attempted to make the system <em>feature and interface
+  compatible</em> with GitHub, which as we saw in our survey at the start of
+  the talk is by-far the most popular proprietary hosting solutions used by
+  FOSS developers.</p>
+</span>
+</section>
+
+
+<!-- , If you wanted to talk about GiveUpGitHub, or the
+  -- CoPilot mess, it could fit here.  I tend to end my talks with "positive",
+  -- then "big negative", so I would normally put here.  I think you have to
+  -- cut it for time anyway. --!>
+                  
+
+<section>
+<!-- Next slide -->
+
+
+
 <h3 >Follow-Up / Talk License</h3>
 <p>Please donate to become a Conservancy
   Sustainer: <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/sustainer/">https://sfconservancy.org/sustainer/</a></p>

what-bkuhn-was-going-to-say.md

@@ -222,3 +222,9 @@ While we don't like the term, Bradley calls this “free as in cocaine”.
 
 
 
+## Final Slides
+
+The remain slides are very wordy.  I did start to feel my symptoms works
+around 13:45 local, so while I'd sped up, I then slowed down.  The slides
+should probably be edited, the text of what's there placed here, and the
+words on the slide should be less.