From fb10ed4ce54c66720b19b3a8c5e8a296c1fa1dfc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Bradley M. Kuhn"
@@ -139,9 +137,81 @@
In the late 1990s, it became obvious that the Free Software Foundation USA
+ (FSF USA) was not able to do every possible task for the toolchain
+ projects, which included:
+ Microsoft Acquires GitHub
Meanwhile, in Copyleft Land …
+
+
+
+
A compromise was reached, creating the Sourceware project (which years + later became an SFC member project).
+Because the project was founded by developers who valued copyleft, + Sourceware remains always unwilling to allow for-profit interests influence + the hosting.
+ +This resistance by individuals from allowing for-profit control continued + — even though Sourceware's physical servers physically reside in + donated rack space from Cygnus (then Red Hat and now IBM).
+ +Sourceware is admittedly not the infrastructure of choice for folks who + don't do low-level C/C++ programming, but it does serve the needs of that + community well.
+ +Please take a look at the Forejgo project, and the German-based + non-profit, Codeberg.
+ +There are many other similar systems, we think Forejgo is strategic + because they have attempted to make the system feature and interface + compatible with GitHub, which as we saw in our survey at the start of + the talk is by-far the most popular proprietary hosting solutions used by + FOSS developers.
+ +Please donate to become a Conservancy Sustainer: https://sfconservancy.org/sustainer/