Note earlier in the text that I was looking specifically for STV systems.
This commit is contained in:
parent
603a7e7d15
commit
8b48610db8
1 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions
15
README
15
README
|
@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
|
|||
# Why This Fork of GNOME Foundation's Voting System?
|
||||
|
||||
When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member
|
||||
projects, I surveyed various different systems. There are precious few Free
|
||||
Software voting systems. [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good
|
||||
option, but upon discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill,
|
||||
he confirmed that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms
|
||||
designed for multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential
|
||||
voting system with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
|
||||
projects, I surveyed various different systems. I was mostly looking for
|
||||
something that implemented STV algorithms.
|
||||
|
||||
As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems.
|
||||
[Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon
|
||||
discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed that
|
||||
it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for multiple
|
||||
winner elections. So, if you want a preferential voting system with just one
|
||||
winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
|
||||
|
||||
Now, if you're looking specifically for
|
||||
[range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue