Conservancy/voting
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Note earlier in the text that I was looking specifically for STV systems.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-02-10 16:50:50 -05:00
parent 603a7e7d15
commit 8b48610db8
1 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

15
README
View file

@ -1,12 +1,15 @@
# Why This Fork of GNOME Foundation's Voting System? # Why This Fork of GNOME Foundation's Voting System?
When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member
projects, I surveyed various different systems. There are precious few Free projects, I surveyed various different systems. I was mostly looking for
Software voting systems. [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good something that implemented STV algorithms.
option, but upon discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill,
he confirmed that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems.
designed for multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon
voting system with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice. discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed that
it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for multiple
winner elections. So, if you want a preferential voting system with just one
winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
Now, if you're looking specifically for Now, if you're looking specifically for
[range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then [range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then