Another rewrite of the first section of the README,
now including information that I got from Karl Fogel about E-Vote and OpenSTV's last known GPL release.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									96683ddde9
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						48865240c6
					
				
					 1 changed files with 27 additions and 21 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										48
									
								
								README
									
										
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										48
									
								
								README
									
										
									
									
									
								
							|  | @ -2,32 +2,38 @@ | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member | When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member | ||||||
| projects, I surveyed various different systems.  I was mostly looking for | projects, I surveyed various different systems.  I was mostly looking for | ||||||
| something that implemented STV algorithms. | something that implemented STV algorithm and ballot collection for the same. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems. | As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems. | ||||||
| [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon |  | ||||||
| discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed that |  | ||||||
| it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for multiple |  | ||||||
| winner elections.  So, if you want a preferential voting system with just one |  | ||||||
| winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice. |  | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| Now, if you're looking specifically for |   * [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon | ||||||
| [range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then |     discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed | ||||||
| [Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections) |     that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for | ||||||
| probably what you want. |     multiple winner elections.  So, if you want a preferential voting system | ||||||
|  |     with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms, |   * [Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections)'s | ||||||
| [PpenSTV](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is your best |     supports only [range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting). | ||||||
| choice.  OpenSTV is a command-line based system that implements all sorts of |  | ||||||
| voting algorithms, but it has no vote-collection system.  (It's also worth |  | ||||||
| noting that openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that |  | ||||||
| were released as Free Software are still available.) |  | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| GNOME Foundation, noticing this, implemented their own little hacked-together |   * Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms, | ||||||
| system to collect votes for their annual Directorship elections, and they |     [OpenSTV](https://github.com/Conservatory/openstv) is the best | ||||||
| have the code available in their |     choice for counting votes using various STV methods.  OpenSTV is a | ||||||
| [GNOME Foundation website repository](https://git.gnome.org/browse/foundation-web/). |     command-line based system that implements all sorts of voting algorithms, | ||||||
| This project is a fork of that repository, with *just* the voting stuff |     but it has no vote-collection system.  (It's also worth noting that | ||||||
|  |     openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that were | ||||||
|  |     released as Free Software are still available.) | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  |   * [E-Vote](https://github.com/mdipierro/evote) is a system focusing on the | ||||||
|  |     collection of ballots, and seems promising in its design, but it is | ||||||
|  |     relatively poorly documented and it was unclear upon initial evaluation | ||||||
|  |     if STV-style ballots were available. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  |   * GNOME Foundation hacked together a system in the | ||||||
|  |     [GNOME Foundation website repository](https://git.gnome.org/browse/foundation-web/) | ||||||
|  |     implemented their own little hacked-together system to collect votes for | ||||||
|  |     their annual Directorship elections. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | This project is a fork of GNOME's work, with *just* the voting stuff | ||||||
| included.  Most of the GNOME-isms have been removed, although a few remain. | included.  Most of the GNOME-isms have been removed, although a few remain. | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| I've also offered patches back to the GNOME Foundation repository by | I've also offered patches back to the GNOME Foundation repository by | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue