Another rewrite of the first section of the README,
now including information that I got from Karl Fogel about E-Vote and OpenSTV's last known GPL release.
This commit is contained in:
parent
96683ddde9
commit
48865240c6
1 changed files with 27 additions and 21 deletions
48
README
48
README
|
@ -2,32 +2,38 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member
|
When I was setting up Conservancy's ability to run elections for its member
|
||||||
projects, I surveyed various different systems. I was mostly looking for
|
projects, I surveyed various different systems. I was mostly looking for
|
||||||
something that implemented STV algorithms.
|
something that implemented STV algorithm and ballot collection for the same.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems.
|
As it turns out, there are precious few Free Software voting systems.
|
||||||
[Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon
|
|
||||||
discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed that
|
|
||||||
it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for multiple
|
|
||||||
winner elections. So, if you want a preferential voting system with just one
|
|
||||||
winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now, if you're looking specifically for
|
* [Selectricity](http://selectricity.org/) is a good option, but upon
|
||||||
[range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting), then
|
discussions with the primary author, Benjamin "Mako" Hill, he confirmed
|
||||||
[Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections)
|
that it does not currently implement any of the algorithms designed for
|
||||||
probably what you want.
|
multiple winner elections. So, if you want a preferential voting system
|
||||||
|
with just one winner, Selectricity is probably the best choice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms,
|
* [Fedora's election system](https://github.com/fedora-infra/elections)'s
|
||||||
[PpenSTV](http://packages.debian.org/unstable/main/openstv) is your best
|
supports only [range voting](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_voting).
|
||||||
choice. OpenSTV is a command-line based system that implements all sorts of
|
|
||||||
voting algorithms, but it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth
|
|
||||||
noting that openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that
|
|
||||||
were released as Free Software are still available.)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
GNOME Foundation, noticing this, implemented their own little hacked-together
|
* Meanwhile, for various STV algorithms,
|
||||||
system to collect votes for their annual Directorship elections, and they
|
[OpenSTV](https://github.com/Conservatory/openstv) is the best
|
||||||
have the code available in their
|
choice for counting votes using various STV methods. OpenSTV is a
|
||||||
[GNOME Foundation website repository](https://git.gnome.org/browse/foundation-web/).
|
command-line based system that implements all sorts of voting algorithms,
|
||||||
This project is a fork of that repository, with *just* the voting stuff
|
but it has no vote-collection system. (It's also worth noting that
|
||||||
|
openstv has since been taken proprietary, but older versions that were
|
||||||
|
released as Free Software are still available.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* [E-Vote](https://github.com/mdipierro/evote) is a system focusing on the
|
||||||
|
collection of ballots, and seems promising in its design, but it is
|
||||||
|
relatively poorly documented and it was unclear upon initial evaluation
|
||||||
|
if STV-style ballots were available.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* GNOME Foundation hacked together a system in the
|
||||||
|
[GNOME Foundation website repository](https://git.gnome.org/browse/foundation-web/)
|
||||||
|
implemented their own little hacked-together system to collect votes for
|
||||||
|
their annual Directorship elections.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This project is a fork of GNOME's work, with *just* the voting stuff
|
||||||
included. Most of the GNOME-isms have been removed, although a few remain.
|
included. Most of the GNOME-isms have been removed, although a few remain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
I've also offered patches back to the GNOME Foundation repository by
|
I've also offered patches back to the GNOME Foundation repository by
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue