Developer documentation stuff.
This commit is contained in:
parent
915d39fe2d
commit
15203fc6db
2 changed files with 17 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -68,4 +68,7 @@ does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
|
|||
### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]
|
||||
- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?
|
||||
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||UseCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?
|
||||
- Does the project [[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
|
||||
- Does the project
|
||||
[[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
|
||||
- Is there good [[developer documentation|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-docs]]?
|
||||
- How easy it to [[engage as a developer with the community|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-welcoming]]?
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -29,5 +29,17 @@ aligned.
|
|||
Given that the project is going to solicit support and contributions from
|
||||
501(c)(3)'s, this issue is particularly important.
|
||||
|
||||
## No Legal Barriers
|
||||
## Developer Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
<a id="dev-docs"></a>
|
||||
|
||||
The right choice has to have an accessible codebase. Since no accounting
|
||||
package yet deals with the issues specific to non-profit organizations, this
|
||||
project will have to focus on bringing developers *to* the new project.
|
||||
|
||||
<a id="dev-welcoming"></a>
|
||||
|
||||
As such, the codebase needs to be accessible. Communication with the
|
||||
core developers should be possible and interactive. The project should
|
||||
be willing to accept new contributors who might want to make substantial
|
||||
changes to the codebase.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue