diff --git a/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn b/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
index ca9dc06..d9583cd 100644
--- a/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
+++ b/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
@@ -68,4 +68,7 @@ does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]
- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||UseCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?
-- Does the project [[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
+- Does the project
+ [[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
+- Is there good [[developer documentation|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-docs]]?
+- How easy it to [[engage as a developer with the community|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-welcoming]]?
diff --git a/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn b/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn
index 1d8deec..a091366 100644
--- a/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn
+++ b/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn
@@ -29,5 +29,17 @@ aligned.
Given that the project is going to solicit support and contributions from
501(c)(3)'s, this issue is particularly important.
-## No Legal Barriers
+## Developer Documentation
+
+
+The right choice has to have an accessible codebase. Since no accounting
+package yet deals with the issues specific to non-profit organizations, this
+project will have to focus on bringing developers *to* the new project.
+
+
+
+As such, the codebase needs to be accessible. Communication with the
+core developers should be possible and interactive. The project should
+be willing to accept new contributors who might want to make substantial
+changes to the codebase.