183 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
183 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown
% Brief Introduction to the GNU General Public License
|
|
% Bradley M. Kuhn
|
|
% Monday 24 March 2014
|
|
|
|
# Audience Polls
|
|
|
|
+ My goal here is to move faster or slower based on audience knowledge.
|
|
|
|
+ There are folks in this audience who have worked with this stuff for years,
|
|
and those who are completely new.
|
|
|
|
+ We want these presentations to be valuable to all of you.
|
|
|
|
+ Please, don't be embarrassed:
|
|
+ Ever GPL expert in the world, including me, started as a student who
|
|
knew none of this.
|
|
|
|
# IANAL
|
|
|
|
<cite>IANAL</cite>
|
|
|
|
# My Affiliations
|
|
|
|
+ Formerly had John's job, Executive Director of FSF, years ago.
|
|
|
|
+ Currently: on Board of Directors of FSF.
|
|
|
|
+ President of Software Freedom Conservancy.
|
|
|
|
# How These Orgs Relate to GPL?
|
|
|
|
+ FSF
|
|
+ Invented copyleft.
|
|
+ Authors & stewards of the GPL.
|
|
+ Holder of copyrights on many key GNU programs …
|
|
+ … and therefore enforcers of those copyrights.
|
|
|
|
+ Software Freedom Conservancy
|
|
+ Adviser on legal issues of copyright, etc. to Free Software projects.
|
|
+ Holder of some copyrights on its member projects.
|
|
+ Enforcer of GPL on behalf of many copyright holders in:
|
|
+ BusyBox, Samba, Mercurial, and the kernel named Linux.
|
|
|
|
# How this Hour Will Go?
|
|
|
|
+ Materials presented will mix the simple & complex.
|
|
|
|
+ We cannot possibly cover the entire GPL in one hour.
|
|
|
|
+ Discuss: motivations, origins, then a few of GPL's sections.
|
|
|
|
+ I understand the mix of backgrounds in the audience.
|
|
|
|
# A Restaurant's Lawyer?
|
|
|
|
+ Considering why you want to learn this.
|
|
|
|
+ What if your client was a restaurant?
|
|
|
|
+ What would you want to need to know?
|
|
|
|
# Restaurant Lawyer: What'd You Study?
|
|
|
|
+ If you were a restaurant's lawyer:
|
|
|
|
+ Probably three areas of law you'd focus on:
|
|
+ building codes.
|
|
+ health and safety regulations.
|
|
+ tax regulations.
|
|
|
|
+ Who would want to hear from?
|
|
|
|
# Restaurant Lawyer: What'd You Study?
|
|
|
|
+ Figure out the motivations behind the building code:
|
|
+ What parts are arcane and less important to inspectors?
|
|
+ How do inspections work?
|
|
+ What are the penalties?
|
|
|
|
+ Figure out the same for health & safety:
|
|
+ Who inspects, and when?
|
|
+ What's the health code say, and what checklist do inspectors use?
|
|
|
|
+ Is there any way the two interrelate?
|
|
|
|
+ Who is in charge of all this?
|
|
|
|
+ What was the purpose and intent of these regulations?
|
|
|
|
# Why Listen To Us?
|
|
|
|
+ FSF: Understanding the purpose and intent of the GPL.
|
|
|
|
+ Conservancy & FSF:
|
|
+ both enforce the GPL.
|
|
+ if your client violates, you will hear from one of us.
|
|
|
|
+ Such access to drafters, interpreters, enforcers is likely highly unique.
|
|
|
|
+ Someday, someone in this room may (or already has) sit across the table
|
|
from you in negotiations.
|
|
|
|
+ Our transparency does make your job easier.
|
|
|
|
# The Mindset of GPL
|
|
|
|
+ GPL protects software freedom.
|
|
|
|
+ Ultimate goal: make sure every user has the four freedoms.
|
|
|
|
+ Freedom to run the software.
|
|
|
|
+ Freedom to study and modify the software.
|
|
|
|
+ Freedom to share the software.
|
|
|
|
+ Freedom to distribute modified versions.
|
|
|
|
+ Every clause in GPL was designed to uphold one of these freedoms.
|
|
+ Or, it's a compromise of drafting in adoption vs. freedom debate.
|
|
|
|
# Using Copyright
|
|
|
|
+ GPL is primarily a copyright license.
|
|
|
|
+ Software is copyrighted.
|
|
|
|
+ License grants key freedoms.
|
|
|
|
+ Requirement prohibit activities that take away freedoms.
|
|
|
|
+ General concept: copyleft.
|
|
|
|
+ Specific implementation: GPL.
|
|
|
|
<hr/>
|
|
|
|
<span class="fitonslide">
|
|
|
|
> an original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression … from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device
|
|
|
|
<p align=right>
|
|
— 17 USC \S~102
|
|
</p>
|
|
</span>
|
|
|
|
# Conditional Permissions
|
|
|
|
+ A copyleft license grants copyright permissions, conditionally.
|
|
|
|
+ Think of the phrase: “provided that”
|
|
|
|
+ “provided that”: appears (in some form) only
|
|
|
|
+ 4 times in GPLv2
|
|
|
|
+ 9 times in GPLv3.
|
|
|
|
# Compare To Proprietary Licenses
|
|
|
|
+ Yes, the GPL has its requirements.
|
|
|
|
+ But *none* of these activities are ever permitted under proprietary
|
|
licenses.
|
|
|
|
+ If you don't like what the GPL requires you to do, then just tell your
|
|
client to use the proprietary software instead.
|
|
|
|
+ That way, they know the answer to every question is “no&;rdquo,
|
|
|
|
+ rather than: “yes, but only as long as you …”
|
|
|
|
# The Technical Gap
|
|
|
|
+ Understanding GPL well requires a some software expertise & legal
|
|
expertise.
|
|
|
|
+ You don't have to be a professional on either side to grok it.
|
|
+ but you're best off if you're a professional in one & an amateur
|
|
in the other.
|
|
|
|
+ Most important technical concepts you need:
|
|
+ source code, binaries, methods of distribution.
|