updated analysis.
This commit is contained in:
parent
844bf4ba5b
commit
f3585ce68d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ both a ``method of operation'' (using an approach not dissimilar to the
|
||||||
First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for
|
First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for
|
||||||
compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and
|
compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and
|
||||||
Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies),
|
Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies),
|
||||||
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
|
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly
|
Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly
|
||||||
detailed software derivative work analysis. Most often, cases involve
|
detailed software derivative work analysis. Most often, cases involve
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue