From f3585ce68db1ef47511a02867a3f4f391968eaaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tony Sebro Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:58:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] updated analysis. --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index 1603e58..ec8afcd 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ both a ``method of operation'' (using an approach not dissimilar to the First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies), -and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b). +and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b). Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly detailed software derivative work analysis. Most often, cases involve