updated analysis.

This commit is contained in:
Tony Sebro 2014-03-18 20:58:52 -04:00 committed by Bradley M. Kuhn
parent 844bf4ba5b
commit f3585ce68d

View file

@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ both a ``method of operation'' (using an approach not dissimilar to the
First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for
compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and
Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies),
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly
detailed software derivative work analysis. Most often, cases involve