the gpl
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									20fba8b654
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						e1f07949fe
					
				
					 1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ but they may not revoke the rights under GPLv2 already granted. | |||
| 
 | ||||
| In fact, when an entity looses their right to copy, modify and distribute | ||||
| GPL'd software, it is because of their \emph{own actions}, not that of the | ||||
| copyright holder.  The copyright holder does not decided when GPLv2~\S4 | ||||
| copyright holder.  The copyright holder does not decide when GPLv2~\S4 | ||||
| termination occurs (if ever); rather, the actions of the licensee determine | ||||
| that. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  | @ -2043,8 +2043,8 @@ freedom. | |||
| 
 | ||||
| While GPL is by default a copyright license, it is certainly still possible | ||||
| to consider GPL as a contract as well.  For example, some distributors chose | ||||
| to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to GPL, and nothing in | ||||
| GPL prohibits that use.  Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen | ||||
| to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to the GPL, and nothing in | ||||
| the GPL prohibits that use.  Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen | ||||
|   v. Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373, 1380 (Fed.Cir.2008)} indicates that \textbf{both} | ||||
| copyright and contractual remedies may be sought by a copyright holder | ||||
| seeking to enforce a license designed to uphold software freedom. | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 donaldr3
						donaldr3