the gpl
This commit is contained in:
parent
20fba8b654
commit
e1f07949fe
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ but they may not revoke the rights under GPLv2 already granted.
|
|||
|
||||
In fact, when an entity looses their right to copy, modify and distribute
|
||||
GPL'd software, it is because of their \emph{own actions}, not that of the
|
||||
copyright holder. The copyright holder does not decided when GPLv2~\S4
|
||||
copyright holder. The copyright holder does not decide when GPLv2~\S4
|
||||
termination occurs (if ever); rather, the actions of the licensee determine
|
||||
that.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2043,8 +2043,8 @@ freedom.
|
|||
|
||||
While GPL is by default a copyright license, it is certainly still possible
|
||||
to consider GPL as a contract as well. For example, some distributors chose
|
||||
to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to GPL, and nothing in
|
||||
GPL prohibits that use. Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen
|
||||
to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to the GPL, and nothing in
|
||||
the GPL prohibits that use. Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen
|
||||
v. Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373, 1380 (Fed.Cir.2008)} indicates that \textbf{both}
|
||||
copyright and contractual remedies may be sought by a copyright holder
|
||||
seeking to enforce a license designed to uphold software freedom.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue