diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 332185e..8f81a26 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -1982,7 +1982,7 @@ but they may not revoke the rights under GPLv2 already granted.
 
 In fact, when an entity looses their right to copy, modify and distribute
 GPL'd software, it is because of their \emph{own actions}, not that of the
-copyright holder.  The copyright holder does not decided when GPLv2~\S4
+copyright holder.  The copyright holder does not decide when GPLv2~\S4
 termination occurs (if ever); rather, the actions of the licensee determine
 that.
 
@@ -2043,8 +2043,8 @@ freedom.
 
 While GPL is by default a copyright license, it is certainly still possible
 to consider GPL as a contract as well.  For example, some distributors chose
-to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to GPL, and nothing in
-GPL prohibits that use.  Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen
+to ``wrap'' their software in an acceptance ceremony to the GPL, and nothing in
+the GPL prohibits that use.  Furthermore, the ruling in \textit{Jacobsen
   v. Katzer, 535 F.3d 1373, 1380 (Fed.Cir.2008)} indicates that \textbf{both}
 copyright and contractual remedies may be sought by a copyright holder
 seeking to enforce a license designed to uphold software freedom.