Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Rewrite paragraph for readability.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-11-19 12:53:29 -05:00
parent 39ead95e9b
commit b9f7a402a6
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
compliance-guide.tex
View file

@ -1430,13 +1430,14 @@ the inquiry served other consulting purposes later.
Feelings and opinions about this behavior are mixed within the larger
copyleft community. Some see it as a reasonable business model and others
renounce it as corrupt behavior. However, from the point of view of a GPL
violator, the most important issue is to determine the motivations of the
enforcer. The COGEOs such as the FSF and Conservancy have made substantial
renounce it as corrupt behavior. Regardless, a GPL
violator should always immediately determine the motivations of the
enforcer via documented, verifiable facts. For example, COGEOs such as the FSF and Conservancy have made substantial
public commitments to enforce in a way that is uniform, transparent, and
publicly documented. Since these organizations are public charities, they
are accountable to the IRS and the public at large in their annual Form 990
filings, and everyone can examine their revenue models and scrutinize their
publicly documented. Furthermore, since these specific organizations are
public charities in the USA, they
are accountable to the IRS (and the public at large) in their annual Form 990
filings. Everyone may examine their revenue models and scrutinize their
work.
However, entities and individuals who do GPL enforcement centered primarily