Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

re-distributors

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
donaldr3 2014-03-21 16:51:57 -04:00
parent 1dd7d7b4cc
commit 4753f14a82
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -1578,9 +1578,9 @@ say that this condition is any way unreasonable is simply ludicrous.)
\label{GPLv2s2-at-no-charge}
The next phrase of note in GPLv2~\S2(b) is ``licensed \ldots at no charge.''
This phrase confuses many. The sloppy reader points out this as ``a
contradiction in GPL'' because (in their confused view) that clause of GPLv2~\S2 says that redistributors cannot
contradiction in GPL'' because (in their confused view) that clause of GPLv2~\S2 says that re-distributors cannot
charge for modified versions of GPL'd software, but GPLv2~\S1 says that
they can. Avoid this confusion: the ``at no charge'' \textbf{does not} prohibit redistributors from
they can. Avoid this confusion: the ``at no charge'' \textbf{does not} prohibit re-distributors from
charging when performing the acts governed by copyright
law,\footnote{Recall that you could by default charge for any acts not
governed by copyright law, because the license controls are confined
@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ available to the public at large. However, the text here does not say
that. Instead, it says that the licensing under terms of the GPL must
extend to anyone who might, through the distribution chain, receive a copy
of the software. Distribution to all third parties is not mandated here,
but GPLv2~\S2(b) does require redistributors to license the derivative works in
but GPLv2~\S2(b) does require re-distributors to license the derivative works in
a way that extends to all third parties who may ultimately receive a
copy of the software.