the gpl and restriction/condition

This commit is contained in:
donaldr3 2014-03-21 16:50:11 -04:00
parent 30389cad6c
commit 1dd7d7b4cc

View file

@ -1567,11 +1567,11 @@ holder of \workg{}. (Imagine, for a moment, if \workg{} were a proprietary
product --- would its copyright holders give you permission to create and distribute
\gplusi{} without paying them a hefty sum?) The license of \workg{}, the
GPL, states the options for the copyright holder of \worki{}
who may want to create and distribute \gplusi{}. GPL's pre-granted
who may want to create and distribute \gplusi{}. The GPL's pre-granted
permission to create and distribute derivative works, provided the terms
of GPL are upheld, goes far above and beyond the permissions that one
of the GPL are upheld, goes far above and beyond the permissions that one
would get with a typical work not covered by a copyleft license. (Thus, to
say that this restriction is any way unreasonable is simply ludicrous.)
say that this condition is any way unreasonable is simply ludicrous.)
\medskip