From 1dd7d7b4cc56aa95df3c5318253471dea463dd30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: donaldr3 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:50:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] the gpl and restriction/condition --- gpl-lgpl.tex | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index b58a1b3..3d3ed64 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -1567,11 +1567,11 @@ holder of \workg{}. (Imagine, for a moment, if \workg{} were a proprietary product --- would its copyright holders give you permission to create and distribute \gplusi{} without paying them a hefty sum?) The license of \workg{}, the GPL, states the options for the copyright holder of \worki{} -who may want to create and distribute \gplusi{}. GPL's pre-granted +who may want to create and distribute \gplusi{}. The GPL's pre-granted permission to create and distribute derivative works, provided the terms -of GPL are upheld, goes far above and beyond the permissions that one +of the GPL are upheld, goes far above and beyond the permissions that one would get with a typical work not covered by a copyleft license. (Thus, to -say that this restriction is any way unreasonable is simply ludicrous.) +say that this condition is any way unreasonable is simply ludicrous.) \medskip