Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix typos in "Consumer Purchase and Unboxing" sec

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Denver Gingerich 2014-11-07 10:54:25 -05:00
parent 4bf096baa2
commit 105da6758b
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
enforcement-case-studies.tex
View file

@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ open market to verify that distribution of the copylefted software therein
complies with binary distribution requirements (such as those
\tutorialpartsplit{discussed in \textit{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and
Related Licenses}}{discussed here in \S~\ref{GPLv2s3} and
\S~\ref{GPLv3s6}}.
\S~\ref{GPLv3s6}}).
% FIXME: Above is my only use of \tutorialpartsplit in this chapter. I just
% got lazy and that should be fixed by someone.
@ -315,8 +315,8 @@ complies with binary distribution requirements(such as those
Therefore, the investigator first purchased the TPE-NWIFIROUTER through an
online order, and when the package arrived, examined the contents of the box.
The investigator immediately discovered that ThinkPenguin had taken advice
from \S~\ref{offer-for-source} in this guide, and have chosen to use
\hyperref[GPLv2s3a]{GPLv2\S3(a)} and \hyperref[GPLv3s6]{GPLv3s6}, rather an
from \S~\ref{offer-for-source} in this guide, and had chosen to use
\hyperref[GPLv2s3a]{GPLv2\S3(a)} and \hyperref[GPLv3s6]{GPLv3s6}, rather than
using the \hyperref[offer-for-source]{problematic offer for source
provisions}. This choice not only speeds up the investigation (since there
is no CCS offer to test), but also simplifies the compliance requirements for