Fix a couple typos in case study intro paragraph
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									a94763abe4
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						4bf096baa2
					
				
					 1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -266,7 +266,7 @@ However, in the experience of the two primary community-oriented enforcers, | |||
| Conservancy and the FSF, such CCS results routinely fix the description of | ||||
| ``barely complies with GPL's requirements''.  To use an academic analogy: | ||||
| while a ``C'' is certainly a passing grade, any instructor prefers to | ||||
| disseminate to the class a exemplar sample that earned an ``A''. | ||||
| disseminate to the class an exemplar sample that earned an ``A''. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Fortunately, thanks in large part to the FSF's | ||||
| ``Respects Your Freedom'' (RYF) certification campaign\footnote{\href{RYF is | ||||
|  | @ -285,7 +285,7 @@ Specifically, this chapter discusses the purchase, CCS provision, and a | |||
| step-by-step build and installation analysis of a specific, physical, | ||||
| embedded electronics product.  The product in question is | ||||
| \href{https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/free-software-wireless-n-broadband-router-gnu-linux-tpe-nwifirouter}{the | ||||
|   ``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}\footnote{The FSF of | ||||
|   ``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}.\footnote{The FSF of | ||||
|   course performed a thorough CCS check as part of the certification process. | ||||
|   The analysis discussed herein was independently performed by Software | ||||
|   Freedom Conservancy without reviewing any findings of the FSF, and thus the | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Denver Gingerich
						Denver Gingerich