Fix typos in "Consumer Purchase and Unboxing" sec

This commit is contained in:
Denver Gingerich 2014-11-07 10:54:25 -05:00
parent 4bf096baa2
commit 105da6758b

View file

@ -302,10 +302,10 @@ investigator seeks to take actions that reasonably technically knowledgeable
users would during the ordinary course of their acquisition and use of
products. As such, the investigator typically purchases the device on the
open market to verify that distribution of the copylefted software therein
complies with binary distribution requirements(such as those
complies with binary distribution requirements (such as those
\tutorialpartsplit{discussed in \textit{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and
Related Licenses}}{discussed herein \S~\ref{GPLv2s3} and
\S~\ref{GPLv3s6}}.
Related Licenses}}{discussed here in \S~\ref{GPLv2s3} and
\S~\ref{GPLv3s6}}).
% FIXME: Above is my only use of \tutorialpartsplit in this chapter. I just
% got lazy and that should be fixed by someone.
@ -315,8 +315,8 @@ complies with binary distribution requirements(such as those
Therefore, the investigator first purchased the TPE-NWIFIROUTER through an
online order, and when the package arrived, examined the contents of the box.
The investigator immediately discovered that ThinkPenguin had taken advice
from \S~\ref{offer-for-source} in this guide, and have chosen to use
\hyperref[GPLv2s3a]{GPLv2\S3(a)} and \hyperref[GPLv3s6]{GPLv3s6}, rather an
from \S~\ref{offer-for-source} in this guide, and had chosen to use
\hyperref[GPLv2s3a]{GPLv2\S3(a)} and \hyperref[GPLv3s6]{GPLv3s6}, rather than
using the \hyperref[offer-for-source]{problematic offer for source
provisions}. This choice not only speeds up the investigation (since there
is no CCS offer to test), but also simplifies the compliance requirements for