Last wordsmith pass of this footnote. It's not worth more time than this,

I'm just having fun with it.

gpl-lgpl.tex

@@ -2156,14 +2156,14 @@ terms surrounding it (see \textit{Stevenson v.~TRW, Inc.}, 987 F.2d 288, 296
 (5th Cir.~1993)).  While GPLv3's drafters doubted that such authority would
 apply to copyright licenses like the GPL, the FSF has nevertheless left
 warranty and related disclaimers in \textsc{all caps} throughout all versions
-of GPL\@\footnote{\textsc{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley
-    M.~Kuhn, has often suggested the aesthetically preferable compromise of a
-    specifically designed ``small caps'' font, such as this one, as an
-    alternative to} WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT FONT (LIKE THIS)\@.
-  The latter seems to add more ugliness than conspicuousness.  Kuhn once
-  engaged in reversion war with a lawyer who disagreed, but that lawyer has
-  still yet to answer Kuhn's requests to produce any case law that argues
-  THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.}.
+of GPL\@\footnote{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley M.~Kuhn, has
+  often suggested the aesthetically preferable compromise of a
+  \textsc{specifically designed ``small caps'' font, such as this one, as an
+    alternative to} WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT FONT (LIKE THIS),
+  since the latter adds more ugliness than conspicuousness.  Kuhn once
+  engaged in reversion war with a lawyer who disagreed, but that lawyer never
+  answered Kuhn's requests for case law that argues THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE
+  CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.}.
 
 Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
 its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However, GPLv2~\S11