Wordsmith the footnote from previous commit.

gpl-lgpl.tex

@@ -2157,14 +2157,13 @@ terms surrounding it (see \textit{Stevenson v.~TRW, Inc.}, 987 F.2d 288, 296
 apply to copyright licenses like the GPL, the FSF has nevertheless left
 warranty and related disclaimers in \textsc{all caps} throughout all versions
 of GPL\@\footnote{\textsc{One of the authors of this tutorial, Bradley
-    M.~Kuhn, has often suggested that as compromise, use of a specifically
-    designed ``small caps'' font, such as the one used herein, is
-    aesthetically preferable to merely} WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT
-  FONT (LIKE THIS), WHICH SEEMS TO ADD UGLINESS RATHER THAN
-  CONSPICUOUSNESS\@.  Indeed, Kuhn once got into a reversion war in a
-  document with a lawyer who disagreed with this, but the lawyer in question
-  ignored Kuhn's requests to produce any case law that argued THIS IS MORE
-  CONSPICUOUS \textit{Than this is}.}.
+    M.~Kuhn, has often suggested the aesthetically preferable compromise of a
+    specifically designed ``small caps'' font, such as this one, as an
+    alternative to} WRITING IN ALL CAPS IN THE DEFAULT FONT (LIKE THIS)\@.
+  The latter seems to add more ugliness than conspicuousness.  Kuhn once
+  engaged in reversion war with a lawyer who disagreed, but that lawyer has
+  still yet to answer Kuhn's requests to produce any case law that argues
+  THIS IS INHERENTLY MORE CONSPICUOUS \textsc{Than this is}.}.
 
 Some have argued the GPL is unenforceable in some jurisdictions because
 its disclaimer of warranties is impermissibly broad.  However, GPLv2~\S11