Conservancy/website
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

fix file names for transcript

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Pono Takamori 2023-10-12 12:12:37 -07:00
parent 31214bac7c
commit 30bc4968e3
Signed by: pono
GPG key ID: 17BB4167325DAA02
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
View file

@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
<p>Vizio has still not provided CCS for their televisions to SFC, and so our lawsuit continues. Instead, Vizio <a href="/blog/2021/dec/28/vizio-update-1/">attempted to &ldquo;remove&rdquo;</a> the case to federal court (arguing that copyright claims <em>preempted</em> our third-party beneficiary contract claim). We <a href="/news/2022/may/16/vizio-remand-win/">succeeded in our motion to remand the case back to state court</a>; the federal judge <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.30.0.pdf">agreed that our case included an &ldquo;extra element&rdquo;</a> not covered by copyright.</p>
<p>After several months of litigation back in state court, Vizio <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28 VIZIOs Motion for Summary Judgment with Reservation.pdf">filed for</a> <a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html#summary-judgment">summary judgment</a> in the state court <em>again</em> arguing copyright preemption. The state court is not bound by the federal court's ruling against preemption, so Vizio was able to essentially re-argue its motion to dismiss. Vizio also argued that the GPL Agreements have no third-party beneficiaries), which is the first time Vizio has tried to attack these claims substantively.Currently, we are awaiting the judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for summary judgment.</p>
<p>After several months of litigation back in state court, Vizio <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28_VIZIOs_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_with_Reservation.pdf">filed for</a> <a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html#summary-judgment">summary judgment</a> in the state court <em>again</em> arguing copyright preemption. The state court is not bound by the federal court's ruling against preemption, so Vizio was able to essentially re-argue its motion to dismiss. Vizio also argued that the GPL Agreements have no third-party beneficiaries (which is the first time Vizio has tried to attack these claims substantively). Currently, we are awaiting the judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for summary judgment.</p>
<p>The case is currently set for trial starting on March 25, 2024.</p>
<p>The case is currently set for trial to begin on March 25, 2024.</p>
<h3>Portions of Interest from the Docket in the Vizio Case</h3>
@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Below are documents from the docket(s) in this SFC v. Vizio case of interest,
provided in (roughly) chronological order:
<ul>
<br>
<li><a
href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">SFC's
Original Complaint, 2021-10-19</li>
@ -39,12 +39,14 @@ Original Complaint, 2021-10-19</li>
<li>Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgement</li>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28 VIZIOs Motion for Summary Judgment with Reservation.pdf">Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28_VIZIOs_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_with_Reservation.pdf">Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/SFC_response_to_summary_judgement.pdf">SFC's response to Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Vizio_summary_judgement_reply_brief.pdf">Vizio's reply to SFC's response to Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</a></li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Transcript_Full_Vizios_MSJ_HearingDeptC-33.231005.pdf">Full transcript from the hearing</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>MEDIA CONTACT</h3>
You can reach out media team at <a href="mailto:media@sfconservancy.org">&lt;media@sfconservancy.org&gt;</a></p>
{% endblock %}