Vizio has still not provided CCS for their televisions to SFC, and so our lawsuit continues. Instead, Vizio attempted to “remove” the case to federal court (arguing that copyright claims preempted our third-party beneficiary contract claim). We succeeded in our motion to remand the case back to state court; the federal judge agreed that our case included an “extra element” not covered by copyright.
-After several months of litigation back in state court, Vizio filed for summary judgment in the state court again arguing copyright preemption. The state court is not bound by the federal court's ruling against preemption, so Vizio was able to essentially re-argue its motion to dismiss. Vizio also argued that the GPL Agreements have no third-party beneficiaries), which is the first time Vizio has tried to attack these claims substantively.Currently, we are awaiting the judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for summary judgment.
+After several months of litigation back in state court, Vizio filed for summary judgment in the state court again arguing copyright preemption. The state court is not bound by the federal court's ruling against preemption, so Vizio was able to essentially re-argue its motion to dismiss. Vizio also argued that the GPL Agreements have no third-party beneficiaries (which is the first time Vizio has tried to attack these claims substantively). Currently, we are awaiting the judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for summary judgment.
-The case is currently set for trial starting on March 25, 2024.
+The case is currently set for trial to begin on March 25, 2024.