Conservancy/website
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

update vizio case pages and menus

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Pono Takamori 2023-10-12 12:15:22 -07:00
commit 136fecaaf1
Signed by: pono
GPG key ID: 17BB4167325DAA02
8 changed files with 187 additions and 125 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
www/conservancy/static/activities/index.html
View file

@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
<h2>Vizio Lawsuit</h2>
<ul>
<li class="VizioMain"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">About the Lawsuit</a></li>
<li class="VizioPressRelease"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioPressRelease"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio-filing-press-release.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioComplaint"><a href="/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">Complaint</a></li>
<li class="VizioQandA"><a href="/press/qanda.html">Q&amp;A</a></li>
</ul>

10
www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html
View file

@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ reach out to info@sfconservancy.org</p>
<h3 id="bash">Bash</h3>
A very common utility for Linux-based systems. Bash was originally released under the General Public License version 2 (GPLv2), but newer versions of Bash are under version 3 (GPLv3). Descendants of both versions are utilized in the industry.
<h3 id="complaint">Compliant (in a lawsuit)</h3>
<p>In the context of a lawsuit, the Complaint is the document that begins the
lawsuit. It states the basic claims of action by the Plaintiff, and their
requests for remedy for the matter.</p>
<h3 id="ccs">Complete Corresponding Source (CCS)</h3>
<p>Informally, <acronym title="Complete Corresponding Source">CCS</acronym> is all of the technical materials and source code required to modify, run, and/or reinstall the software. The <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym> and <acronym title="Lesser General Public License">LGPL</acronym> have a formal definitions for <acronym title="Complete Corresponding Source">CCS</acronym>, which is sometimes called "Corresponding Source."</p>
@ -86,6 +91,11 @@ A very common utility for Linux-based systems. Bash was originally released unde
<h3 id="specific-performance">specific performance</h3>
<p>Fulfilling the requirements of a contract in exactly the way the contract specifies. When most contracts are disputed in court, the plaintiff expects to receive money, that they can use to remedy the harm that the other party caused them in not holding up their side of the deal. When a plaintiff seeks specific performance, they want something that money can’t replace.</p>
<h3 id="summary-judgment">Summary Judgment</h3>
<p>In a <em>summary judgment</em> motion, a party in a lawsuit asks the Court
to rule immediately on some (or all) of the claims made in <a
href="#complaint">the complaint</a>.
<h3 id="third-party-beneficiary">third-party beneficiaries of the GPL</h3>
<p>People who aren’t a party to a <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym> agreement, but who would benefit from the contract if the parties to the <acronym title="General Public License">GPL</acronym> do as they promise under the agreement. An example of such a benefit might be the receipt of the source code of the GPL’d software. See also General Public License (GPL).</p>

139
www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vizio-filing-press-release.html Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
{% extends "base_vizio.html" %}
{% block subtitle %}Copyleft Compliance Projects - {% endblock %}
{% block submenuselection %}VizioMain{% endblock %}
{% block content %}
<h1>Software Freedom Conservancy files right-to-repair lawsuit against California TV manufacturer Vizio Inc. for alleged GPL violations</h1>
<h2>Litigation is historic in nature due to its focus on consumer rights, filing as third-party beneficiary</h2>
<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong></p>
<p>IRVINE, Calif. (Oct. 19, 2021) Software Freedom Conservancy announced today
it has filed a lawsuit against Vizio Inc. for what it calls repeated failures
to fulfill even the basic requirements of the General Public License (GPL).</p>
<p>The lawsuit alleges that Vizio’s TV products, built on its SmartCast system,
contain software that Vizio unfairly appropriated from a community of
developers who intended consumers to have very specific rights to modify,
improve, share, and reinstall modified versions of the software.</p>
<p>The GPL is a copyleft license that ensures end users the freedom to run,
study, share, and modify the software. Copyleft is a kind of software
licensing that leverages the restrictions of copyright, but with the intent
to promote sharing (using copyright licensing to freely use and repair
software).</p>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy, a nonprofit organization focused on ethical
technology, is filing the lawsuit as the purchaser of a product which has
copylefted code. This approach makes it the first legal case that focuses on
the rights of individual consumers as third-party beneficiaries of the GPL.
<p>&ldquo;That’s what makes this litigation unique and historic in terms of
defending consumer rights,&rdquo; says Karen M. Sandler, the organization’s
executive director.</p>
<p>According to the lawsuit, a consumer of a product such as this has the
right to access the source code so that it can be modified, studied, and
redistributed (under the appropriate license conditions).</p>
<p>&ldquo;We are asking the court to require Vizio to make good on its
obligations under copyleft compliance requirements,&rdquo; says
Sandler. She explains that in past litigation, the plaintiffs have always
been copyright holders of the specific GPL code. In this case, Software
Freedom Conservancy hopes to demonstrate that it's not just the copyright
holders, but also the receivers of the licensed code who are entitled to
rights.</p>
<p>The lawsuit suit seeks no monetary damages, but instead seeks access to
the technical information that the copyleft licenses require Vizio to provide
to all customers who purchase its TVs (specifically, the plaintiff is asking
for the technical information via &ldquo;specific performance&rdquo; rather
than &ldquo;damages&rdquo;).</p>
<p>&ldquo;Software Freedom Conservancy is standing up for customers who are
alienated and exploited by the technology on which they increasingly
rely,&rdquo; says Sandler, adding that the lawsuit also aims to help
educate consumers about their right to repair their devices as well as show
policy makers that there are mechanisms for corporate accountability
already in place that can be leveraged through purchasing power and
collective action.</p>
<p>Copyleft licensing was designed as an ideological alternative to the
classic corporate software model because it: allows people who receive the
software to fix their devices, improve them and control them; entitles people
to curtail surveillance and ads; and helps people continue to use their
devices for a much longer time (instead of being forced to purchase new
ones).</p>
<p>&ldquo;The global supply chain shortages that have affected everything
from cars to consumer electronics underscore one of the reasons why it is
important to be able to repair products we already own,&rdquo; says
Sandler. &ldquo;Even without supply chain challenges, the forced obsolescence
of devices like TVs isn’t in the best interest of the consumer or even the
planet. This is another aspect of what we mean by &lsquo;ethical
technology.&rsquo; Throwing away a TV because its software is no longer
supported by its manufacturer is not only wasteful, it has dire environmental
consequences. Consumers should have more control over this, and they would if
companies like Vizio played by the rules.&ldquo;</p>
<p>According to Sandler, the organization first raised the issue of
non-compliance with the GPL with Vizio in August 2018. After a year of
diplomatic attempts to work with the company, it was not only still refusing
to comply, but stopped responding to inquiries altogether as of January 2020.</p>
<p>&ldquo;By July 2021, the TV model that we originally complained was
non-compliant was discontinued,” says Sandler. “When we purchased new models,
we found that despite our efforts they still had no source code included with
the device, nor any offer for source code. People buying these models would
never know that there was anything special about the software in these
devices, or that they had any rights whatsoever connected with the software
on their TVs.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy analyzed the TVs and concluded that not only
was Vizio not providing the source code and technical information that
copyleft licenses require, Vizio was not even informing its customers about
copylefted software and the rights it gives them as consumers.</p>
<h3>ABOUT SOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY</h3>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy is a nonprofit organization centered around
ethical technology. Our mission is to ensure the right to repair, improve,
and reinstall software. We promote and defend these rights through fostering
free and open source software (FOSS) projects, driving initiatives that
actively make technology more inclusive, and advancing policy strategies that
defend FOSS (such as copyleft). The organization is incorporated in New
York. For more information, go
to <a href="https://sfconservancy.org">sfconservancy.org</a>.</p>
<h3>SUPPLEMENTAL RESOURCES FOR JOURNALISTS</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-announce-press-kit.pdf">A
full press kit, with substantial additional information and resources for
journalists covering this story, can be viewed and downloaded here.</li>
<li><a href="/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">The
legal complaint is available</a>.</li>
</ul>
<h3>MEDIA CONTACT</h3>
<p>Hannah Gregory, Media Rep for Good Causes<br/>
<a href="mailto:media@sfconservancy.org">&lt;media@sfconservancy.org&gt;</a></p>
{% endblock %}

153
www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html
View file

@ -3,137 +3,50 @@
{% block submenuselection %}VizioMain{% endblock %}
{% block content %}
<h1>Software Freedom Conservancy files right-to-repair lawsuit against California TV manufacturer Vizio Inc. for alleged GPL violations</h1>
<h2>Litigation is historic in nature due to its focus on consumer rights, filing as third-party beneficiary</h2>
<h1>Current Status of Vizio Case</h1>
<p><strong>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</strong></p>
<p>We are awaiting the state judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for <a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html#summary-judgment">summary judgment</a>.</p>
<p>IRVINE, Calif. (Oct. 19, 2021) Software Freedom Conservancy announced today
it has filed a lawsuit against Vizio Inc. for what it calls repeated failures
to fulfill even the basic requirements of the General Public License (GPL).</p>
<h3>History of Vizio Case</h3>
<p>On October 19, 2021, SFC filed a third-party beneficiary contract <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">lawsuit</a> against Vizio in California State Court in Orange County, CA. Our <a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html#complaint">complaint</a> demands <em>no financial compensation</em> but instead asks for what truly matters with regard to software rights and freedom: the "specific performance" (fulfilling a contract requirement in exactly the way the contract specifies) of production of complete, corresponding source code (CCS) &mdash; as defined in the various GPL Agreements (such as GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1).</p>
<p>Vizio has still not provided CCS for their televisions to SFC, and so our lawsuit continues. Instead, Vizio <a href="/blog/2021/dec/28/vizio-update-1/">attempted to &ldquo;remove&rdquo;</a> the case to federal court (arguing that copyright claims <em>preempted</em> our third-party beneficiary contract claim). We <a href="/news/2022/may/16/vizio-remand-win/">succeeded in our motion to remand the case back to state court</a>; the federal judge <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.30.0.pdf">agreed that our case included an &ldquo;extra element&rdquo;</a> not covered by copyright.</p>
<p>The lawsuit alleges that Vizio’s TV products, built on its SmartCast system,
contain software that Vizio unfairly appropriated from a community of
developers who intended consumers to have very specific rights to modify,
improve, share, and reinstall modified versions of the software.</p>
<p>After several months of litigation back in state court, Vizio <a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28_VIZIOs_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_with_Reservation.pdf">filed for</a> <a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html#summary-judgment">summary judgment</a> in the state court <em>again</em> arguing copyright preemption. The state court is not bound by the federal court's ruling against preemption, so Vizio was able to essentially re-argue its motion to dismiss. Vizio also argued that the GPL Agreements have no third-party beneficiaries (which is the first time Vizio has tried to attack these claims substantively). Currently, we are awaiting the judge's ruling on Vizio's motion for summary judgment.</p>
<p>The case is currently set for trial to begin on March 25, 2024.</p>
<h3>Portions of Interest from the Docket in the Vizio Case</h3>
<p>The GPL is a copyleft license that ensures end users the freedom to run,
study, share, and modify the software. Copyleft is a kind of software
licensing that leverages the restrictions of copyright, but with the intent
to promote sharing (using copyright licensing to freely use and repair
software).</p>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy, a nonprofit organization focused on ethical
technology, is filing the lawsuit as the purchaser of a product which has
copylefted code. This approach makes it the first legal case that focuses on
the rights of individual consumers as third-party beneficiaries of the GPL.
<p>&ldquo;That’s what makes this litigation unique and historic in terms of
defending consumer rights,&rdquo; says Karen M. Sandler, the organization’s
executive director.</p>
<p>According to the lawsuit, a consumer of a product such as this has the
right to access the source code so that it can be modified, studied, and
redistributed (under the appropriate license conditions).</p>
<p>&ldquo;We are asking the court to require Vizio to make good on its
obligations under copyleft compliance requirements,&rdquo; says
Sandler. She explains that in past litigation, the plaintiffs have always
been copyright holders of the specific GPL code. In this case, Software
Freedom Conservancy hopes to demonstrate that it's not just the copyright
holders, but also the receivers of the licensed code who are entitled to
rights.</p>
<p>The lawsuit suit seeks no monetary damages, but instead seeks access to
the technical information that the copyleft licenses require Vizio to provide
to all customers who purchase its TVs (specifically, the plaintiff is asking
for the technical information via &ldquo;specific performance&rdquo; rather
than &ldquo;damages&rdquo;).</p>
<p>&ldquo;Software Freedom Conservancy is standing up for customers who are
alienated and exploited by the technology on which they increasingly
rely,&rdquo; says Sandler, adding that the lawsuit also aims to help
educate consumers about their right to repair their devices as well as show
policy makers that there are mechanisms for corporate accountability
already in place that can be leveraged through purchasing power and
collective action.</p>
<p>Copyleft licensing was designed as an ideological alternative to the
classic corporate software model because it: allows people who receive the
software to fix their devices, improve them and control them; entitles people
to curtail surveillance and ads; and helps people continue to use their
devices for a much longer time (instead of being forced to purchase new
ones).</p>
<p>&ldquo;The global supply chain shortages that have affected everything
from cars to consumer electronics underscore one of the reasons why it is
important to be able to repair products we already own,&rdquo; says
Sandler. &ldquo;Even without supply chain challenges, the forced obsolescence
of devices like TVs isn’t in the best interest of the consumer or even the
planet. This is another aspect of what we mean by &lsquo;ethical
technology.&rsquo; Throwing away a TV because its software is no longer
supported by its manufacturer is not only wasteful, it has dire environmental
consequences. Consumers should have more control over this, and they would if
companies like Vizio played by the rules.&ldquo;</p>
<p>According to Sandler, the organization first raised the issue of
non-compliance with the GPL with Vizio in August 2018. After a year of
diplomatic attempts to work with the company, it was not only still refusing
to comply, but stopped responding to inquiries altogether as of January 2020.</p>
<p>&ldquo;By July 2021, the TV model that we originally complained was
non-compliant was discontinued,” says Sandler. “When we purchased new models,
we found that despite our efforts they still had no source code included with
the device, nor any offer for source code. People buying these models would
never know that there was anything special about the software in these
devices, or that they had any rights whatsoever connected with the software
on their TVs.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy analyzed the TVs and concluded that not only
was Vizio not providing the source code and technical information that
copyleft licenses require, Vizio was not even informing its customers about
copylefted software and the rights it gives them as consumers.</p>
<h3>ABOUT SOFTWARE FREEDOM CONSERVANCY</h3>
<p>Software Freedom Conservancy is a nonprofit organization centered around
ethical technology. Our mission is to ensure the right to repair, improve,
and reinstall software. We promote and defend these rights through fostering
free and open source software (FOSS) projects, driving initiatives that
actively make technology more inclusive, and advancing policy strategies that
defend FOSS (such as copyleft). The organization is incorporated in New
York. For more information, go
to <a href="https://sfconservancy.org">sfconservancy.org</a>.</p>
<h3>SUPPLEMENTAL RESOURCES FOR JOURNALISTS</h3>
Below are documents from the docket(s) in this SFC v. Vizio case of interest,
provided in (roughly) chronological order:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-announce-press-kit.pdf">A
full press kit, with substantial additional information and resources for
journalists covering this story, can be viewed and downloaded here.</li>
<br>
<li><a
href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">SFC's
Original Complaint, 2021-10-19</li>
<li><a href="/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">The
legal complaint is available</a>.</li>
<li>Removal (to federal court) and Remand (to state court)</li>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.1.0.pdf">Vizio's Motion to Remove (to federal court)</li>
<li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.14.0_1.pdf">SFC's Motion to Remand (to state court)</li>
<li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.24.0_1.pdf">Vizio's Opposition of SFC's Motion to Remand (to state court)</li>
<li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.32.0.pdf">Transcript of the hearing of the motion to remand</a></li>
<li><a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808/gov.uscourts.cacd.837808.30.0.pdf"><strong>Decision by the federal court to remand the case to state court</strong></li>
</ul>
<li>Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgement</li>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/2023-4-28_VIZIOs_Motion_for_Summary_Judgment_with_Reservation.pdf">Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/SFC_response_to_summary_judgement.pdf">SFC's response to Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Vizio_summary_judgement_reply_brief.pdf">Vizio's reply to SFC's response to Vizio's Motion for Summary Judgment</a></li>
<li><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/docs/Transcript_Full_Vizios_MSJ_HearingDeptC-33.231005.pdf">Full transcript from the hearing</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>MEDIA CONTACT</h3>
<p>Hannah Gregory, Media Rep for Good Causes<br/>
<a href="mailto:media@sfconservancy.org">&lt;media@sfconservancy.org&gt;</a></p>
You can reach out media team at <a href="mailto:media@sfconservancy.org">&lt;media@sfconservancy.org&gt;</a></p>
{% endblock %}

2
www/conservancy/static/press/index.html
View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
and reference.</p>
<p><a href="https://shoestring.agency/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SFC_PressKit_10-19-2021_v1.pdf">Full Press Kit</a></p>
<p><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">Press Release</a></p>
<p><a href="https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/vizio-filing-press-release.html">Press Release</a></p>
<p><a href="https://shoestring.agency/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/SFC_FactSheet_GeneralPublic.pdf">Fact Sheet</a></p>
<p><a href="/copyleft-compliance/glossary.html">Glossary</a></p>
<p><a href="/press/qanda.html">Q&A</a></p>

2
www/conservancy/static/press/vizio-coverage.html
View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
{% block content %}
<h1 id="VizioPress">Vizio Lawsuit Press Coverage</h1>
<p>Here are articles in the press that covered <a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">our Vizio lawsuit</a>.</p>
<p>Here are articles in the press that covered <a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">our Vizio lawsuit</a>.</p>
<h2 id="Filing">Coverage of the <a href="/">Decision to Remand by the Federal Court</a></h2>
<ul class="press-articles">

2
www/conservancy/templates/base_compliance.html
View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
<h2>Vizio Lawsuit</h2>
<ul>
<li class="VizioMain"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">About the Lawsuit</a></li>
<li class="VizioPressRelease"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioPressRelease"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio-filing-press-release.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioComplaint"><a href="/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">Complaint</a></li>
<li class="VizioQandA"><a href="/press/qanda.html">Q&amp;A</a></li>
</ul>

2
www/conservancy/templates/base_vizio.html
View file

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
<h2>Vizio Lawsuit</h2>
<ul>
<li class="VizioMain"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">About the Lawsuit</a></li>
<li class="VizioMain"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioPressRelease"><a href="/copyleft-compliance/vizio-filing-press-release.html">Press Release</a></li>
<li class="VizioComplaint"><a href="/docs/software-freedom-conservancy-v-vizio-complaint-2021-10-19.pdf">Complaint</a></li>
<li class="VizioQandA"><a href="/press/qanda.html">Q&amp;A</a></li>
<li class="VizioPress"><a href="/press/vizio-coverage.html">Vizio Press Coverage</a></li>