2016-09-30 17:44:55 +00:00
|
|
|
{% extends "base_projects.html" %}
|
|
|
|
{% block subtitle %}Project Services - {% endblock %}
|
2010-10-04 01:44:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{% block submenuselection %}Applying{% endblock %}
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
{% block content %}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-10 14:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
<h1> Applying to Join Conservancy as a Member Project</h1>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>Part of Conservancy's activity is through its member projects. These
|
|
|
|
projects become formally part of Conservancy and have a close relationship
|
|
|
|
with our activity. Most of our projects are purely software projects, but
|
|
|
|
we also occasionally accept initiatives designed to advance software
|
|
|
|
freedom, such as Outreachy.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>The situation for non-profit homes for FOSS activities has improved
|
|
|
|
greatly since Conservancy was founded in 2006. In the USA, options now
|
|
|
|
exist for 501(c)(3), 501(c)(6) and even for-profit fiscal sponsorship, and
|
|
|
|
there are other options around the globe as well. Prospective member
|
|
|
|
projects should carefully consider what type of structure is right for
|
|
|
|
them.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>For our part, Conservancy seeks projects that dedicate themselves to the
|
|
|
|
advancement of software freedom and focus their projects on the rights of
|
|
|
|
users to copy, share, modify and improve their software. Being a FOSS
|
|
|
|
project under an OSI-approved and DFSG-free license is mandatory, but not
|
|
|
|
the only criteria. Given the many options available for fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsorship, we are selective and often refer projects to other fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsors that are a better fit. Nevertheless, we encourage projects to
|
|
|
|
that need a non-profit home to apply to many fiscal sponsors.
|
2024-07-22 07:25:35 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>Conservancy's Evaluation Committee considers applications on a rolling
|
|
|
|
basis. Conservancy generally has dozens of projects in various stages of
|
|
|
|
the application process. We do not move rapidly to accept new projects, as
|
|
|
|
we have found that consideration of joining or forming a non-profit
|
|
|
|
organization for your project is best done with careful consideration over
|
|
|
|
a period of many months rather than rapidly.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Conservancy's application process is somewhat informal. New applicants
|
|
|
|
should write an initial inquiry email
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
to <a href="mailto:apply@sfconservancy.org"><apply@sfconservancy.org></a>
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
with a very brief description of their project and a URL to their project's
|
|
|
|
website. We'll send back initial questions, and after those questions are
|
|
|
|
answered, we'll send the full application materials. Applications should
|
|
|
|
be submitted in plain ASCII text via email. Your application will be
|
|
|
|
assigned a ticket number in our ticketing system, and please be sure to
|
|
|
|
include the proper ticket number details in the Subject line of your
|
|
|
|
emails to ensure they are routed to the right place.</p>
|
2012-09-03 20:34:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Projects are reviewed by Conservancy's Evaluation Committee, which is
|
|
|
|
chartered by Conservancy's <a href="/about/board/">Board of
|
|
|
|
Directors</a>.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h1>Project Membership Application FAQs</h1>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-04 01:44:32 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>The following are various questions that we typically get from project
|
|
|
|
leaders that wish to apply to Conservancy.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-03 20:37:24 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>I sent in my inquiry letter and/or application a long time ago. Why haven't you replied?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Conservancy receives an overwhelming level of interest and we have very few
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
<a href="/about/staff/">staff positions</a> to
|
2012-09-03 20:37:24 +00:00
|
|
|
meet the interest and demand
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
for <a href="/members/services/">Conservancy's
|
2012-09-03 20:37:24 +00:00
|
|
|
services</a> to its member projects. Meanwhile, Conservancy always
|
|
|
|
prioritizes needs of
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
its <a href="/members/current/">existing member
|
2012-09-03 20:37:24 +00:00
|
|
|
projects</a> over new inquiries and applications. Therefore, it
|
|
|
|
sometimes can take quite a while to finish the application process and
|
|
|
|
be offered membership, but please note that such delays mean that should
|
|
|
|
your project ultimately become a member project, your project will then
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
be a beneficiary of this policy. Also, generally speaking, we encourage
|
|
|
|
care and consideration when joining a non-profit and we do not believe
|
|
|
|
a rapid membership process is in the interest of projects.</p>
|
2012-09-03 20:37:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-04 01:44:32 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>What are the key criteria our project must meet to join?</h2>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-12-16 16:06:47 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>In order to join, projects need to meet certain criteria. A rough
|
|
|
|
outline of those criteria are as follows:</p>
|
2014-03-28 01:26:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-18 13:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
<ul><li>The project must be exclusively devoted to the development and
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
documentation of FOSS. The project's goals must be consistent with
|
|
|
|
Conservancy's tax-exempt purposes, and other requirements imposed on
|
|
|
|
Conservancy by the IRS' 501(c)(3) rules. Namely, the goal of the project
|
|
|
|
must to develop and document the software in a not-for-profit way to
|
|
|
|
advance the public good, and must develop the software in public, and
|
|
|
|
strategically advance software freedom for all users.</li>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<li>The project must be licensed in a way fitting with software freedom
|
|
|
|
principles. Specifically, all software of the project should be
|
|
|
|
licensed under a license that is listed both as as
|
2010-12-16 16:06:47 +00:00
|
|
|
an <a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical">Open
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
Source license by the Open Source Initiative</a> and
|
|
|
|
as <a href="https://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/">DFSG-Free
|
|
|
|
license</a>. All software documentation for the project should be
|
|
|
|
licensed under a license on the preceding lists, or under Creative
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
Commons' <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/">CC-By-SA</a>
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
or <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">CC-By</a> or
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
<a href="https://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/">CC-0</a>.</li>
|
2010-12-16 16:06:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<li>The project should have an existing, vibrant, diverse community
|
|
|
|
that develops and documents the software. For example, projects
|
|
|
|
that have been under development for less than a year or only a
|
|
|
|
“proof of concept” implementation are generally not
|
|
|
|
eligible.</li>
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>While any project meeting the criteria above can apply, meeting these
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
criteria doesn't guarantee acceptance of your project. Conservancy
|
2010-12-16 16:06:47 +00:00
|
|
|
favors projects that are well-established and have some track record of
|
|
|
|
substantial contributions from a community of volunteer developers.
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Furthermore, Conservancy does give higher priority to projects that
|
2010-12-16 16:06:47 +00:00
|
|
|
have an established userbase and interest, but also tries to accept some
|
|
|
|
smaller projects with strong potential.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>Is our project required to accept membership if offered?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Not at all. Many projects apply and subsequently decide not to join a
|
|
|
|
non-profit, or decide to join a different non-profit entity. Don't
|
|
|
|
worry about “wasting our time” if your project's developers
|
2010-12-16 19:02:19 +00:00
|
|
|
aren't completely sure yet if they want to join Conservancy. If
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
membership in Conservancy is currently a legitimate consideration for
|
|
|
|
your project, we encourage you to apply. We'd rather that you apply and
|
|
|
|
turn down an offer for membership than fail to apply and have to wait
|
|
|
|
until the next application round when you're sure.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-19 14:20:37 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>What benefits does our project get from joining?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>We maintain a <a href="/members/services">detailed list of services
|
|
|
|
that Conservancy provides to member projects</a>. If you have
|
|
|
|
detailed questions about any of the benefits, please
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
ask <a href="mailto:apply@sfconservancy.org"><apply@sfconservancy.org></a>
|
|
|
|
in your application ticket. We find however that projects will find
|
|
|
|
Conservancy a better fit if you don't view Conservancy as a service
|
|
|
|
provider; we are not a service provider in the sense of your hosting
|
|
|
|
provider or other vendor. Conservancy projects become a part of
|
|
|
|
Conservancy, and as such membership with Conservancy is an equal
|
|
|
|
partnership between you and your project and should be treated as such.
|
|
|
|
If that's not the kind of relationship you want from your fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsor, then other options are likely a better fit for your project.</p>
|
2010-11-19 14:20:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-11-19 14:24:26 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>Conservancy seems to be called a “fiscal sponsor” to its
|
|
|
|
member projects. Does that mean you give our project money if we join?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>It's true that we would love to fund our member projects if it were
|
|
|
|
possible, because we believe they deserve to be funded. However, that's
|
|
|
|
not typically what a fiscal sponsor does. The term “fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsor“ is often used in non-profit settings and has a standard
|
|
|
|
meaning there. But, to those not familiar with non-profit operations,
|
|
|
|
it comes across as a bit of a misnomer.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>In this context, a fiscal sponsor is a non-profit organization that,
|
|
|
|
rather than fund a project directly, provides the required
|
|
|
|
infrastructure and facilitates the project's ability to raise its own
|
|
|
|
funds. Conservancy therefore assists your project in raising funds, and
|
|
|
|
allows your project to hold those funds and spend them on activities
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
that simultaneously advance Conservancy's non-profit mission
|
2010-11-19 14:24:26 +00:00
|
|
|
and the FLOSS development and documentation goals of the project.</p>
|
2010-11-19 14:20:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>What will the project leaders have to agree to if our project joins?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
2012-09-03 20:56:37 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>Once you're offered membership, Conservancy will send you a draft
|
|
|
|
fiscal sponsorship agreement (FSA). A template
|
2015-09-11 18:22:12 +00:00
|
|
|
of <a href="/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.pdf">Conservancy's FSA
|
2012-09-03 20:56:37 +00:00
|
|
|
is available in PDF</a> (and
|
2015-09-11 18:22:12 +00:00
|
|
|
in <a href="/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.odt">ODT</a>).
|
2012-09-03 20:56:37 +00:00
|
|
|
Please note that the preceding documents are <strong>only
|
|
|
|
templates</strong>. Please do not try to fill one out and send it to
|
|
|
|
Conservancy. The final FSA between Conservancy and your project needs
|
|
|
|
to be negotiated between us, and as can been seen in the template, the
|
|
|
|
Representation section needs substantial work. If your project is
|
|
|
|
offered membership, Conservancy will work with you adapt the FSA
|
|
|
|
template to suit the needs and specific circumstances of your project.
|
|
|
|
This is painstaking work, and it's better to complete that work after
|
|
|
|
both Conservancy and the project are quite sure that they both want the
|
|
|
|
project to join Conservancy.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>If my project joins Conservancy, how will it change?</h2>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Substantively, member projects continue to operate in the same way as
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
they did before joining Conservancy. So long as the project remains
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
devoted to software freedom and operates consistently with the
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Conservancy's tax-exempt status, Conservancy does not intervene in the
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
project's development other than to provide administrative assistance.
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
For example, Conservancy keeps and maintains books and records for the
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
project and assists with the logistics of receiving donations, but does
|
|
|
|
not involve itself with technical or artistic decision making. Projects
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
are asked, however, to keep Conservancy up to date on their
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
activities.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>Additionally, when Conservancy discovers or becomes aware of any legal,
|
|
|
|
licensing or PR issues regarding your project, Conservancy will contact the
|
|
|
|
project and ask you to work collectively with Conservancy.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>Once our project joins, who holds its assets (money, copyrights, trademarks, etc.)?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>Conservancy holds assets on behalf of its member projects and
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
manages and disburses those assets in accordance with the wishes of the
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
project's leadership, as long as those wishes are consistent with non-profit
|
|
|
|
rules, requirements, and Conservancy's mission. Funds received by Conservancy on behalf of a
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
project are kept track of separately for each specific project and the
|
|
|
|
management of those funds is directed by the project. For example, if a
|
|
|
|
donor wanted to contribute $100 to Project Foo, they would formally make
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the donation to Conservancy and identify Project Foo as the desired
|
|
|
|
project to support. Conservancy would then deposit the check and
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
earmark the funds for use by Project Foo. Project Foo would then tell the
|
2011-01-01 16:31:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Conservancy how that money should be spent. As long as that expense is a
|
|
|
|
legitimate non-profit expense fitting with Conservancy's non-profit
|
|
|
|
mission, Conservancy pays the expense on the Project's behalf.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Similarly, any copyrights, trademarks, domain name or other assets
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
transferred to a project are typically held by Conservancy on behalf of
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
the project. A significant service that Conservancy provides its
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
members is a vehicle through which copyright ownership in the project can
|
|
|
|
be unified. There are several advantages to having a consolidated
|
|
|
|
copyright structure, including that it makes enforcement activity easier
|
|
|
|
and more effective. However, copyright, trademark, and domain name
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
assignment is not a requirement in order to join Conservancy, rather,
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
it is an option for those projects that ask for it.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<h2>If our project joins, must it be a member project of Conservancy forever?</h2>
|
|
|
|
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>All agreements between member projects and Conservancy stipulate
|
|
|
|
clearly that the member project can leave Conservancy with a few
|
2011-01-01 16:31:34 +00:00
|
|
|
months' notice. Federal tax exemption law, though, states that projects
|
2012-10-05 19:43:02 +00:00
|
|
|
must transfer their assets from Conservancy in a way that is
|
|
|
|
consistent with Conservancy's not-for-profit tax status —
|
2011-01-01 16:31:34 +00:00
|
|
|
meaning the assets cannot be transferred to an individual or a for-profit
|
|
|
|
entity. Generally, a project would either find another fiscal sponsor or
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
form their own independent tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profit.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>We fully expect that some Conservancy projects will ultimately wish to
|
|
|
|
form their own non-profit 501(c)(3) organizations; that's why we design
|
|
|
|
our agreements with projects to allow them to leave to another 501(c)(3)
|
|
|
|
organization. Typically, projects join Conservancy because the project
|
|
|
|
leaders don't want the burdens of running a non-profit themselves.
|
|
|
|
Often, as projects grow, leaders get interested in the non-profit
|
|
|
|
management and organizational side of the activities and are then
|
|
|
|
prepared to take on the additional work themselves.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-24 06:59:21 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>How are “project leaders” defined with respect to Conservancy?</h2>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>How leaders are chosen for projects varies greatly from project to
|
|
|
|
project. Our goal is to do our best to embody the “natural”
|
|
|
|
leadership structure that evolved in your project into the formal
|
|
|
|
agreement with Conservancy. As part of the agreement drafting, we work
|
|
|
|
carefully with you to understand your project's governance and write up
|
|
|
|
formally with you the decision-making process you use. Most project
|
|
|
|
contributors find this process of formalizing the leadership structure
|
|
|
|
helps them clarify in their own minds the governance of their project,
|
|
|
|
even though the process can be difficult. Since it can be a complicated
|
|
|
|
process, we suggest that you prepare your project community for this
|
|
|
|
discussion once your project is accepted.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-11-10 14:46:44 +00:00
|
|
|
<h2>How much does it cost us financially to join Conservancy?</h2>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-09-03 20:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
<p>New Conservancy members are required to pay 10% of their revenue that
|
|
|
|
Conservancy processes to Conservancy's general fund, which primarily is
|
|
|
|
used to pay staff. (Details on how Conservancy spends its funds,
|
|
|
|
including salaries of key employees, can be found
|
2013-04-26 16:48:19 +00:00
|
|
|
in <a href="/about/filings/">Conservancy's
|
2012-09-03 20:41:20 +00:00
|
|
|
annual filings</a>.)</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>Historically, Conservancy allowed projects to give less or nothing at
|
|
|
|
all to the general fund, but we unfortunately discovered that without
|
|
|
|
this requirement, Conservancy was not able to offer the myriad of
|
|
|
|
services to all its projects, particularly to larger projects that
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
have more income and therefore need more attention from staff. Even now,
|
|
|
|
the 10% we receive from our project does not fully fund our fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsorship activities; we raise additional funds
|
2021-10-15 00:23:42 +00:00
|
|
|
through <a href="/sustainer">support program</a> to subsidize our fiscal
|
2020-09-16 19:50:50 +00:00
|
|
|
sponsorship work.</p>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<p>We do understand that, particularly for small projects that only receive a
|
|
|
|
few small donations, that donating a percentage of your income back to
|
|
|
|
Conservancy can be a high burden. We encourage such small projects to
|
|
|
|
consider <a href="https://www.spi-inc.org/">Software in the Public
|
|
|
|
Interest</a>, which offers fewer services than Conservancy, but only
|
|
|
|
requires 5% of gross revenue. To our knowledge, SPI is the only fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsor operating in FOSS that requires less than 10%; most FOSS fiscal
|
|
|
|
sponsors require at least 10%, or they operate on a fee-for-service model
|
|
|
|
whereby projects pay the actual costs of any service they receive (and such
|
|
|
|
charges are usually much higher than 10%). We urge you to very explicitly
|
|
|
|
ask about these issues with any fiscal sponsor you consider.</p>
|
2010-10-04 01:32:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-10-04 01:44:32 +00:00
|
|
|
{% endblock %}
|