Bradley M. Kuhn
e2c18b409d
In theory, engagement in the proposal drafting process might allow a conflicted person to "tip the scales", thereby justifying their exclusion. However; in practice, it may be that the conflicted person is the only PLC member with the requisite technical expertise or situational awareness to draft a suitably detailed proposal. Is it possible to acknowledge that the rest of the PLC should generally be capable of taking advantage of the conflicted persons special knowledge and contributions to the drafting without allowing the creation of "an uneven playing field". This change allows the conflicted PLC Person to "disclose material facts and to respond to questions" to the drafting process, but does not allow them to do the drafting themselves. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
conflict-of-interest-policy.txt |