cjl from the Sugar Labs committee raised the following concern:
In theory, engagement in the proposal drafting process might allow a
conflicted person to "tip the scales", thereby justifying their
exclusion. However; in practice, it may be that the conflicted
person is the only PLC member with the requisite technical expertise
or situational awareness to draft a suitably detailed proposal. Is
it possible to acknowledge that the rest of the PLC should generally
be capable of taking advantage of the conflicted persons special
knowledge and contributions to the drafting without allowing the
creation of "an uneven playing field".
This change allows the conflicted PLC Person to "disclose material facts
and to respond to questions" to the drafting process, but does not allow
them to do the drafting themselves.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d92b393c39
commit
e2c18b409d
1 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -298,7 +298,8 @@ or her family member), a PLC Person's employer and/or a fellow employee
|
|||
of PLC Person's employer wish to be considered a candidate to fulfill
|
||||
the funded software development contract, that PLC Person has a conflict
|
||||
of interest and must recuse herself or himself from the proposal drafting
|
||||
process and abstain from any vote to approve that proposal. All other
|
||||
process, except to disclose material facts and to respond to questions,
|
||||
and must abstain from any vote to approve that proposal. All other
|
||||
procedures as outlined in <<Procedures-PLC-Persons,_Conflict Resolution Procedures for PLC Persons_>> shall still apply. The PLC must
|
||||
document the PLC Person's abstention from the proposal drafting process
|
||||
in the minutes of the next PLC meeting.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue