diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 27fc5a6..ef2dccb 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -83,13 +83,6 @@
real time.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Post-Sourceforge Diaspora
- Berlios
@@ -103,6 +96,29 @@
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ An Old bkuhn Slide
+
+
+ • Tom Preston-Werner
+ •the “open source almost everything” guy
+ •claimed at OSCON 2013:
+ •“The GPL is a license of restrictions; I don’t like restrictions. just use MIT”
+
+
+
+
+
Follow-Up / Talk License
diff --git a/what-bkuhn-was-going-to-say.md b/what-bkuhn-was-going-to-say.md
index 894e47c..6a00e30 100644
--- a/what-bkuhn-was-going-to-say.md
+++ b/what-bkuhn-was-going-to-say.md
@@ -146,3 +146,45 @@ that, by the time AJAX and Web 2.0 came along, there was not enough
leadership to move an old PHP+HTML application to the more interactive and
modern looks that users were demanding by the late 2000s. [ switch slides ]
+
+## Preston-Warner: Slide 4
+
+Enter GitHub, founded in October 2007. GitHub from its very founding learned
+the VA Linux lesson: don't ever give anyone code, and in fact, take great
+efforts to convince the FOSS community that copyleft, particularly the Affero
+GPL are terrible.
+
+Enter GitHub, founded in October 2007. GitHub from its very founding learned
+the VA Linux lesson: don't ever give anyone any code: keep it all
+proprietary — and if you must release FOSS, do it in a way that doesn't allow
+people to make their own system.
+
+This is an old slide of Bradley's, which he insisted we include even though
+he's shown a slide like this on the main stage at FOSDEM at least once
+before, simply to point out that convincing users of a fully GPL'd VCS
+(namely, Git) to switch to a forge that locked them into proprietary
+services.
+
+While Preston-Warner was pushed out of GitHub due to an unrelated HR
+scandal, his vision, warped morality, and aggressive hatred of copyleft was
+baked into GitHub culture.
+
+In fact, GitHub took great political and advocacy efforts to convince the
+FOSS community that copyleft (particularly the Affero GPL) are terrible
+license beyond this OSCON keynote of Preston-Warner's. We have seen cases,
+BTW, of GitHub employees, proudly sporting their “GitHub employee”
+achievement badge right next to their user icon, go into AGPL'd projects that
+they aren't even **contributing** to with rants about how the AGPL is a bad
+license.
+
+We've also heard reliable intelligence (confirmed by multiple sources) that
+GitHub has an **internal fork of Git itself**. Now, the GPL of course allows
+internal forks, since its copyleft requirements (in most cases — there are a
+few exceptions) trigger only on distribution. Obviously convincing our own
+Git member project to switch to the AGPL is *way beyond* politically viable
+and we haven't even asked. But, this situation shows that if GitHub has a
+legally viable choice between liberating code on their own accord and
+proprietarizing it, they chose proprietarization *every* *single* *time*.
+
+[ next slide ]
+