npo-accounting-ikiwiki/UseCases/WorkFlow.mdwn
Bradley M. Kuhn 45904d4a25 Don't put any text in the <a> with only id so that the class isn't need in CSS.
<joar> you should change it to <a id="foo"></a>Generating reports
<joar> so, just create an empty <a> tag before the anchor target
<bkuhn> is that really the "right way" to do it?
<joar> it's the generally accepted way
<bkuhn> oh, ok.
<joar> it's the way sphinx does it, for example
<joar> I think wikipedia does the same
2013-11-14 12:50:48 -05:00

27 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

# Non-Profit Workflow
Many accounting systems seem to assume that the workflow fits a certain type
of uses. While the ability to impose a specific workflow (e.g., for a
bookkeeper who might make an error easily if the system doesn't require a
workflow), the workflow should not be dictated.
## <a id="unaccrued-invoice"></a>The "Unaccrued Invoice" Example
The easiest example I have of this relates to accruing income upon invoice
generation. Non-profits very typically generate invoices as part of a
fundraising discussion *even though* the non-profit doesn't have a good faith
belief that the invoice will be paid. Using an invoice to convince a donor
to make a donation is, in essence, just a fundraising strategy to pressure
for them to commit to a donation that the donor has hinted they might make.
Under GAAP, these invoices should **not** be accrued nor recognized, because
the organization doesn't have a good faith belief that the income is
forthcoming.
Many accounting systems assume that the user would never possibly generate an
invoice without realizing the income immediately. In most for-profit setups,
this is true, but for non-profits, there is good reason to generate invoices
before accruing the income. In fact, if you're generating an invoice merely
to "inspire" a donation, it's wrong to accrue that, since you don't have a
good faith belief that the invoice will be paid.