96 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
Links:
|
|
|
|
- [[!wikipedia ADempiere]] - Wikipedia
|
|
- [[Files/ADempiere_ERP_and_CRM_Booklet_2013-04_v2.pdf]] - Booklet (PDF, 806K)
|
|
- <http://www.adempiere.com/ADempiere_ERP> - Project wiki/homepage
|
|
|
|
## Preliminary evaluation
|
|
|
|
### Negative
|
|
|
|
- ERP system might mean that there's a lot of complexity and integration in the application, making modifications harder.
|
|
|
|
### Comments
|
|
|
|
Josh Berkus: basically a more enterprise, complex version of PostBooks or LedgerSMB. Likely to be impenetrably difficult to customize.
|
|
|
|
<a id="evaluation"></a>
|
|
## Evaluation
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[Reporting|UseCases/GeneratingReports]] UseCases
|
|
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Chart of Accounts|UseCases/GeneratingReports#chart-of-accounts]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Cash Disbursements Journal|UseCases/GeneratingReports#cash-disbursements]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Income Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#income-report]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Expense Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#expense-report]]: FIXME
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[Reporting|UseCases/GeneratingReports]] UseCases for Fund Accounting
|
|
|
|
Can each of these reports be generated, confined to a specific temporarily
|
|
restricted asset type?
|
|
|
|
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Chart of Accounts|UseCases/GeneratingReports#chart-of-accounts]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Cash Disbursements Journal|UseCases/GeneratingReports#cash-disbursements]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Income Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#income-report]]: FIXME
|
|
- [[Expense Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#expense-report]]: FIXME
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[Fund Accounting|UseCases/FundAccounting]] UseCases
|
|
|
|
- [[Fund-only View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fund-view]]
|
|
- [[Funds as part of whole org View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]
|
|
- [[Ignore Funds for operations|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]
|
|
|
|
### [[UseCases/Collaborating]] evaluation
|
|
- [[Simultaneous Editing of Ledger|UseCases/Collaborating#simultaneous-ledger-edits]]: FIXME
|
|
- FIXME: Other uses cases need rewrite.
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[Double-entry Accounting|UseCases/DoubleEntryAccounting]] UseCases
|
|
|
|
- Does the system implement pure double-entry accounting?
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[TrackingDocumentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation]] UseCases
|
|
|
|
- Does the system [[link up to external documentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-up]]?
|
|
|
|
- Does it have a [[the ability to explore transactions via documentation linkage|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-explore]]?
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[Handling multiple currencies|UseCases/MultiCurrency]] UseCases
|
|
|
|
- Does it support the concept of
|
|
[[a single functional currency|UseCases/MultiCurrency]], while still
|
|
permitting multi-currency entries?
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of [[draft transaction|UseCases/DraftTransactions]] UseCases
|
|
|
|
- Does the system allow
|
|
[[generally for draft transactions|UseCases/DraftTransactions#draft-general]]
|
|
that can be later approved before officially being posted to the books?
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of WorkFlow UseCases
|
|
- Is a [[specific workflow dictated by the system|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-dictated]] ?
|
|
- Is a [[the workflow configurable|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-configurable]] ?
|
|
- [[Unaccrued Invoice|UseCases/WorkFlow#unaccrued-invioice]] ?
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of the [[Reading and Reporting API|UseCases/ReadingAPI]]
|
|
|
|
FIXME: This is assessment of what the API for manipulating the accounting
|
|
data does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of the [[Storage API|UseCases/StorageAPI]]
|
|
|
|
FIXME: This is assessment of what the API for storing the accounting data
|
|
does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
|
|
|
|
### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]
|
|
- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?
|
|
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||UseCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?
|
|
- Does the project
|
|
[[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
|
|
- How many
|
|
[[active developers/companies contribute to the project||USeCases/CommunityHealth#dev-count]]?
|
|
* If there aren't many, how hard would it be to take over the project if needed?
|
|
- Is there good [[developer documentation|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-docs]]?
|
|
- How easy it to [[engage as a developer with the community|UseCases/CommunityHealth#dev-welcoming]]?
|