Notes about RDF in the StorageAPI UseCase.
This commit is contained in:
parent
88d9568553
commit
ea3eac0413
1 changed files with 11 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -65,3 +65,14 @@ Entries have the following fields:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each entry has a globally unique identifier that does not change after its
|
Each entry has a globally unique identifier that does not change after its
|
||||||
first creation.
|
first creation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Storage in RDF
|
||||||
|
<a id="rdf"></a>
|
||||||
|
It was suggested on the
|
||||||
|
[mailing list that RDF might be an interesting format to explore for representation of the stored data](http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/npo-accounting/2013q4/000097.html).
|
||||||
|
This idea might be worth exploring, but the open question is whether or not
|
||||||
|
the StorageAPI needs to specify a specific format?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Regarding this, review of
|
||||||
|
[Up The Asset](https://github.com/zacharyvoase/uptheasset) and
|
||||||
|
[3account](https://code.google.com/p/3account/) might be useful.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue