Updated features - mainly Cost Centers can be tuned to manage Funds
This commit is contained in:
parent
736c8b0186
commit
da30e8b51d
1 changed files with 22 additions and 12 deletions
|
@ -19,8 +19,12 @@ wnframework contains a database model abstraction which is used in some places,
|
|||
|
||||
Not using a database abstraction model such as SQLAlchemy reduces storage portability and adds security overhead to ensure that no malicious queries can be executed.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: SQLAlchemy has a severe performance penalty based on our testing. Plus, SQL reduces the code complexity in many instances and has much better performance too. - *Rushabh*
|
||||
|
||||
In those places I have seen, no input sanitation was performed, although they were only SELECT queries. I suspect that you could alter database contents by modifiying a SELECT query, but I have not managed to do so myself.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: The library does not allow multiple SQL Queries to be executed, hence altering is not possible. There is possibility of overriding certain conditions. We will fix these on priority. - *Rushabh*
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[Reporting|UseCases/GeneratingReports]] UseCases
|
||||
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: [Yes](https://demo.erpnext.com/app.html#trial-balance)
|
||||
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: [Yes](https://demo.erpnext.com/app.html#Form/Bank%20Reconciliation/Bank%20Reconciliation)
|
||||
|
@ -34,18 +38,22 @@ In those places I have seen, no input sanitation was performed, although they we
|
|||
Can each of these reports be generated, confined to a specific temporarily
|
||||
restricted asset type?
|
||||
|
||||
**It does not seem like it**. There are 'Cost Centers', but they do not seem to be usable in fund accounting.
|
||||
*It does not seem like it*. There are 'Cost Centers', but they do not seem to be usable in fund accounting.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: *Yes*. Cost Centers can be easily extended to manage funds. Each Income / Expense is tagged against cost center, so you can accurately track per Fund. Some of the terminology can be fixed if required - *Rushabh*
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Chart of Accounts|UseCases/GeneratingReports#chart-of-accounts]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Cash Disbursements Journal|UseCases/GeneratingReports#cash-disbursements]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Income Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#income-report]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Expense Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#expense-report]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: YES
|
||||
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: YES
|
||||
- [[Chart of Accounts|UseCases/GeneratingReports#chart-of-accounts]]: YES
|
||||
- [[Cash Disbursements Journal|UseCases/GeneratingReports#cash-disbursements]]: YES
|
||||
- [[Income Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#income-report]]: YES
|
||||
- [[Expense Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#expense-report]]: YES
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[Fund Accounting|UseCases/FundAccounting]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
**No**. It does not seem like 'Cost Centers' can be used this way.
|
||||
*No*. It does not seem like 'Cost Centers' can be used this way.
|
||||
|
||||
Update: *Yes*. Please see earlier comment, each fund can be a cost center and invoices, expenses can be booked against it. Even budgeting can be done against a cost center. - *Rushabh*
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Fund-only View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fund-view]]
|
||||
- [[Funds as part of whole org View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]
|
||||
|
@ -75,12 +83,12 @@ restricted asset type?
|
|||
|
||||
- Does the system allow
|
||||
[[generally for draft transactions|UseCases/DraftTransactions#draft-general]]
|
||||
that can be later approved before officially being posted to the books? No
|
||||
that can be later approved before officially being posted to the books? Yes. Each transaction has a Draft and Submitted status. And separate rights can be given to separate roles for doing approvals. Plus rule based approvals based on properties also exist.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of WorkFlow UseCases
|
||||
- Is a [[specific workflow dictated by the system|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-dictated]] ? Yes
|
||||
- Is a [[the workflow configurable|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-configurable]] ? No
|
||||
- [[Unaccrued Invoice|UseCases/WorkFlow#unaccrued-invioice]] ? No
|
||||
- Is a [[the workflow configurable|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-configurable]] ? Yes - there is a workflow system [User Docs](https://docs.erpnext.com/workflows.html)
|
||||
- [[Unaccrued Invoice|UseCases/WorkFlow#unaccrued-invioice]] ? Exists - You can check in Accounts Receivable
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of the [[Reading and Reporting API|UseCases/ReadingAPI]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -106,4 +114,6 @@ and decided that until this policy can be corrected to something more fitting
|
|||
with actual copyright law and that will allow us to contribute under the
|
||||
stated license of the project, it's not worth further evaluation of the codebase,
|
||||
since this policy is just not acceptable. bkuhn has
|
||||
[raised the issue on the ERPNext Developers' Forum](https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=msg/erpnext-developer-forum/jfsURU8Ew9A/HVDX1z3vvkgJ#!msg/erpnext-developer-forum/jfsURU8Ew9A/HVDX1z3vvkgJ).
|
||||
[raised the issue on the ERPNext Developers' Forum](https://groups.google.com/forum/?_escaped_fragment_=msg/erpnext-developer-forum/jfsURU8Ew9A/HVDX1z3vvkgJ#!msg/erpnext-developer-forum/jfsURU8Ew9A/HVDX1z3vvkgJ).
|
||||
|
||||
Udpate: **FIxed** - Rushabh
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue