From a6f247a8a00b3aaf759682f66205daf8dd067b25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://wandborg.se/" Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 17:01:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Initial OpenERP --- ExistingProjects/OpenERP.mdwn | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ExistingProjects/OpenERP.mdwn diff --git a/ExistingProjects/OpenERP.mdwn b/ExistingProjects/OpenERP.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 0000000..83d5d29 --- /dev/null +++ b/ExistingProjects/OpenERP.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Links: + +- [[!wikipedia OpenERP]] - Wikipedia +- - Project homepage +- - Developer portal + +
+2013-10-30T16:02:43  <joar> OpenERP seems promising, I just need to navigate launchpad
+2013-10-30T16:02:56  <joar> trying to find the source code
+2013-10-30T16:06:48  <bkuhn> joar: I'm dubious about openERP myself.
+2013-10-30T16:07:02  <bkuhn> I tried it for use for Conservancy for three months once back in 2008 (before I solidifed on Ledger)
+2013-10-30T16:07:10  <bkuhn> it was highly problematic
+2013-10-30T16:07:13  <bkuhn> for various reasons.
+2013-10-30T16:07:20  <bkuhn> joar: Also, it's a proprietary relicensed codebase.
+2013-10-30T16:07:33  <bkuhn> I think if we were to go with OpenERP, we'd want to prefer Tryton, which is a fork of OpenERP
+2013-10-30T16:09:43  <joar> their codebase seems GPL, but it's hard to get an overview
+2013-10-30T16:09:51  <joar> I'll look into it
+2013-10-30T16:15:49  <bkuhn> joar: I think you'll find it's completely copyrighted by one entity.
+2013-10-30T16:15:53  <bkuhn> and they require copyright assignment on patches, IIRC
+