This commit is contained in:
parent
43d716791c
commit
4ee149738e
1 changed files with 20 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -42,18 +42,24 @@ Josh Berkus: from my perspective, this has all of the drawbacks of ledger-cli, w
|
|||
Can each of these reports be generated, confined to a specific temporarily
|
||||
restricted asset type?
|
||||
|
||||
[GnuCash is not designed for fund accounting](http://lists.gnucash.org/pipermail/gnucash-user/2006-October/017931.html) although it can possibly be configured to use fund accounting.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
- [[Trial Balance Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#trial-balance]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Bank Reconciliation Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#bank-reconcilation]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Chart of Accounts|UseCases/GeneratingReports#chart-of-accounts]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Cash Disbursements Journal|UseCases/GeneratingReports#cash-disbursements]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Income Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#income-report]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Expense Report|UseCases/GeneratingReports#expense-report]]: FIXME
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[Fund Accounting|UseCases/FundAccounting]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Fund-only View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fund-view]]
|
||||
- [[Funds as part of whole org View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]
|
||||
- [[Ignore Funds for operations|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]
|
||||
*Not sure.*
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Fund-only View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fund-view]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Funds as part of whole org View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]: FIXME
|
||||
- [[Ignore Funds for operations|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]]: FIXME
|
||||
|
||||
### [[UseCases/Collaborating]] evaluation
|
||||
- [[Simultaneous Editing of Ledger|UseCases/Collaborating#simultaneous-ledger-edits]]: FIXME
|
||||
|
@ -61,30 +67,30 @@ restricted asset type?
|
|||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[Double-entry Accounting|UseCases/DoubleEntryAccounting]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
- Does the system implement pure double-entry accounting?
|
||||
- Does the system implement pure double-entry accounting? Yes
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[TrackingDocumentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
- Does the system [[link up to external documentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-up]]?
|
||||
- Does the system [[link up to external documentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-up]]? No
|
||||
|
||||
- Does it have a [[the ability to explore transactions via documentation linkage|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-explore]]?
|
||||
- Does it have a [[the ability to explore transactions via documentation linkage|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation#document-link-explore]]? No
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[Handling multiple currencies|UseCases/MultiCurrency]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
- Does it support the concept of
|
||||
[[a single functional currency|UseCases/MultiCurrency]], while still
|
||||
permitting multi-currency entries?
|
||||
permitting multi-currency entries? GnuCash has one currency per account, and whenever a transfer occurs between two accounts with different currency you specify the exchange rate.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of [[draft transaction|UseCases/DraftTransactions]] UseCases
|
||||
|
||||
- Does the system allow
|
||||
[[generally for draft transactions|UseCases/DraftTransactions#draft-general]]
|
||||
that can be later approved before officially being posted to the books?
|
||||
that can be later approved before officially being posted to the books? It does not seem so.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of WorkFlow UseCases
|
||||
- Is a [[specific workflow dictated by the system|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-dictated]] ?
|
||||
- Is a [[the workflow configurable|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-configurable]] ?
|
||||
- [[Unaccrued Invoice|UseCases/WorkFlow#unaccrued-invioice]] ?
|
||||
- Is a [[specific workflow dictated by the system|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-dictated]]? FIXME
|
||||
- Is a [[the workflow configurable|UseCases/WorkFlow#workflow-configurable]]? FIXME
|
||||
- [[Unaccrued Invoice|UseCases/WorkFlow#unaccrued-invioice]]? FIXME
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of the [[Reading and Reporting API|UseCases/ReadingAPI]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -97,8 +103,8 @@ FIXME: This is assessment of what the API for storing the accounting data
|
|||
does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]
|
||||
- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?
|
||||
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||UseCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?
|
||||
- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]? Yes
|
||||
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||UseCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]? Yes
|
||||
- Does the project
|
||||
[[require assignment of copyright or a CLA to get code upstreamed|UseCases/CommunityHealth#no-cla-for-profit]]?
|
||||
- How many
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue