We've long supported skipping documentation checks by flagging the
transaction. We haven't done the same for enumerated metadata because we
need it less often, and bad values tend to do more damage to reports.
However, occasionally when something very off-process happens, we do need it
as a matter of expediency. So support it.
In order to skip validation of these fields, the plugin requires that the
value start with the string "FIXME". This helps ensure that reports have a
consistent way to detect and warn about unfilled values in flagged
transactions.
This is friendlier to the YAML input and consistent with FieldFlags.
Less consistent with the rest of the codebase, but local consistency matters
more IMO.
Next steps:
* A tool to fill the PDF form based on values written to that YAML.
* An extension to fill some of those values with numbers queried from the
books (which is why we need something more involved than FDF).
Where assertions are removed from individual tests, I believe that
functionality is covered by other tests (although probably not to the extent
of checking multiple splits).
A few motivations for this:
* This makes the fund report more maintainable, because the data structure
is better suited to the task at hand, making it easier to follow what's
going on.
* This helps put Balances through a little more testing with a high-level
report.
* This makes the fund report a little faster, since totals are usually
calculated from a smaller number of Balance objects rather than all
Postings over a period.
This is less "future-proof," but the thing is, it's premature to try
to anticipate what other link formats will be in the future. See
discussion in comments.
This was already done correctly in RT links because rtutil takes care of the
quoting. The fact that we weren't doing it for file links was an oversight.
Introduce the get_commodity_format() function, which returns Babel's
usual format string for currencies, but returns a version of it
"merged" with the locale's currency unit pattern for other
commodities.
BaseODS then calls this function where needed to format amounts.
Make it look more like the spreadsheets:
* Don't normalize Expenses negative.
* Consistent account order: Income, then Expenses, then Equity.
* Include a bottom line divider for each fund.
* Default "management" for more accounts.
* There's a good handful of accounts where in past audits, the functional
split has been "Conservancy expenses are management, project expenses are
program." Handle those cases too.
