Everything it said was a problem has been done legitimately in our books at
one point or another.
* Variation in contract can happen in different line items of an invoice or
"group of contractor" situations.
* Variation in cost can happen because one invoice spans a period of time,
like donation matching programs. There is probably still value in a tool
that checks to make sure we use consistent rates each day, but that
affects all kinds of transactions, not just accruals, so it would be
done better in a separate tool.
* Variation in account happens because invoices legitimately span accrual
accounts, like donation matching programs with fees payable.
So: it's gone, good riddance.
This adds almost all the metadata that's relevant to accruals.
I considered adding statement, but that cuased rows to get spaced out a lot,
and statement's kind of a low-value column, so I decided against it.
Ultimately I would like to make this configurable but that's for the
future.
It is more common than I realized that we split an invoice by
entity on the accrual side, so this supports that better.
It still disregards inconsistency between accrual entity and payment entity
for reporting purposes, to help keep reporting clean around automatic
imports.
The changes to BaseReport._report shook out because at this point, the group
key is effectively arbitrary and shouldn't be used for any reporting
purposes.
This works fine with how we're currently using it, makes transformation
methods easier to implement, and avoids potential bugs where a balance is
initialized with a bad mapping.
So far we've been implicitly relying on this by the user passing search
terms that filter out the opening balance transaction. That will stop
happening with the aging report, so we need to do it ourselves.
This was an early mistake, it makes data consistency mistakes too
easy, and I only used it once so far in actual code. Going to fix
this now so I can more safely build on top of this data structure.
It turns out the provided implementation gets us most of the way there,
we just needed to add handling for the special case of zero balances.
Now it's confirmed with tests.
The test changes make them order-sensitive, which they should be.
It's important that our loader methods return date-sorted entries
just like Beancount itself would.
This makes the output more useful for broad searches like on an
entity. Invoices that cross FY boundaries will appear to be paid
without being accrued, and so would appear when we were just
filtering zeroed-out invoices.
If we integrate the aging report into this module in the future,
that'll need to follow different logic, and just filter out
zeroed-out invoices. But the basic balance report and outgoing
report are more workaday tools, where more filtering makes them
more useful.
It makes sense to let the bookkeeper skip validations in situations
where the metadata requires information that might not be available
when entered. It does not make sense to skip validations that *must*
be available and affect the structure of the books, like project and
entity.
This commit ensures every plugin hook has a test for flagged
transactions, even for hooks that currently have the desired
behavior where no code changes were required for the test to
pass.
Building a string and loading it means Beancount can never cache any
load. It only caches top-level file loads because options in the
top-level file can change the semantics of included entries.
Instead use load_file as much as possible, and filter entries as
needed.
The old loading strategy didn't load options, which yielded some
spurious errors. It also created awkward duplication of plugin
information in the code as well as the books.
Implement a new loading strategy that works by reading one of the
"main files" under the books/ subdirectory and includes entries
for additional FYs beyond that.
This is still not ideal in a lot of ways. In particular, Beancount can't
cache any results, causing any load to be slower than it theoretically could
be. I expect more commits to follow. But some of them might require
restructuring the books, and that should happen separately.
This module basically reimplements the old payment-report+income-report,
in a single tool (after setting aside some of the checks that have moved
to the plugin). The aging report can be implemented here too when we need
that.
This makes methods like _replace available in real code, and caught the
bug where we can't use @functools.lru_cache with Transaction arguments,
because they're unhashable due to their mutable members.
