NPO-Accounting/conservancy_beancount
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
conservancy_beancount/tests/test_data_account.py

118 lines
4.3 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

data: Start Account class.
2020-03-17 22:05:24 +00:00
"""Test Account class"""
# Copyright © 2020 Brett Smith
#
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
import pytest
from conservancy_beancount import data
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,under_arg,expected', [
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses:Tax:Sales:', False),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses:Tax:Sales', True),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses:Tax:', True),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses:Tax', True),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses:', True),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expenses', True),
tests: Check Account.is_under works on account boundaries.
2020-03-18 20:26:35 +00:00
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Expense', False),
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Equity:', False),
('Expenses:Tax:Sales', 'Equity', False),
data: Start Account class.
2020-03-17 22:05:24 +00:00
])
data.Account: is_under accepts multiple arguments.
2020-03-19 13:47:10 +00:00
def test_is_under_one_arg(acct_name, under_arg, expected):
expected = under_arg if expected else None
data: Start Account class.
2020-03-17 22:05:24 +00:00
assert data.Account(acct_name).is_under(under_arg) == expected
data.Account: Add is_real_asset method.
2020-03-18 12:59:03 +00:00
data.Account: is_under accepts multiple arguments.
2020-03-19 13:47:10 +00:00
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,expected', [
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
('Assets:Cash', None),
('Assets:Checking', None),
('Assets:Prepaid:Expenses', 'Assets:Prepaid'),
('Assets:Receivable:Accounts', 'Assets:Receivable'),
data.Account: is_under accepts multiple arguments.
2020-03-19 13:47:10 +00:00
])
def test_is_under_multi_arg(acct_name, expected):
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
assert expected == data.Account(acct_name).is_under(
'Assets:Prepaid', 'Assets:Receivable',
)
data.Account: is_under accepts multiple arguments.
2020-03-19 13:47:10 +00:00
if expected:
expected += ':'
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
assert expected == data.Account(acct_name).is_under(
'Assets:Prepaid:', 'Assets:Receivable:',
)
data.Account: is_under accepts multiple arguments.
2020-03-19 13:47:10 +00:00
data.Account: Add is_income method.
2020-03-19 14:23:55 +00:00
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,expected', [
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
('Assets:Bank:Checking', True),
data.Account: Add is_real_asset method.
2020-03-18 12:59:03 +00:00
('Assets:Cash', True),
('Assets:Cash:EUR', True),
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
('Assets:Prepaid:Expenses', False),
('Assets:Prepaid:Vacation', False),
('Assets:Receivable:Accounts', False),
('Assets:Receivable:Fraud', False),
('Expenses:Other', False),
('Equity:OpeningBalance', False),
('Income:Other', False),
('Liabilities:CreditCard', False),
data.Account: Add is_real_asset method.
2020-03-18 12:59:03 +00:00
])
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
def test_is_cash_equivalent(acct_name, expected):
assert data.Account(acct_name).is_cash_equivalent() == expected
data: Add Account.is_checking() method.
2020-03-30 19:01:25 +00:00
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,expected', [
('Assets:Bank:Check9999', True),
('Assets:Bank:CheckCard', True),
('Assets:Bank:Checking', True),
('Assets:Bank:Savings', False),
('Assets:Cash', False),
('Assets:Check9999', True),
('Assets:CheckCard', True),
('Assets:Checking', True),
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
('Assets:Prepaid:Expenses', False),
('Assets:Receivable:Accounts', False),
('Expenses:Other', False),
('Equity:OpeningBalance', False),
('Income:Other', False),
('Liabilities:CreditCard', False),
data: Add Account.is_checking() method.
2020-03-30 19:01:25 +00:00
])
def test_is_checking(acct_name, expected):
assert data.Account(acct_name).is_checking() == expected
Revise chart of accounts used throughout. The main impetus of this change is to rename accounts that were outside Beancount's accepted five root accounts, to move them into that structure. This includes: Accrued:*Payable: → Liabilities:Payable:* Accrued:*Receivable: → Assets:Receivable:* UneanedIncome:* → Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:* Note the last change did inspire in a change to our validation rules. We no longer require income-type on unearned income, because it's no longer considered income at all. Once it's earned and converted to an Income account, that has an income-type of course. This did inspire another rename that was not required, but provided more consistency with the other account names above: Assets:Prepaid* → Assets:Prepaid:* Where applicable, I have generally extended tests to make sure one of each of the five account types is tested. (This mostly meant adding an Equity account to the tests.) I also added tests for key parts of the hierarchy, like Assets:Receivable and Liabilities:Payable, where applicable. As part of this change, Account.is_real_asset() got renamed to Account.is_cash_equivalent(), to better self-document its purpose.
2020-04-03 14:34:10 +00:00
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,expected', [
('Assets:Cash', False),
('Assets:Prepaid:Expenses', False),
('Assets:Receivable:Accounts', False),
('Expenses:Other', False),
('Equity:OpeningBalance', False),
('Income:Other', False),
('Liabilities:CreditCard', True),
('Liabilities:CreditCard:Visa', True),
('Liabilities:Payable:Accounts', False),
('Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:Donations', False),
])
def test_is_credit_card(acct_name, expected):
assert data.Account(acct_name).is_credit_card() == expected
Account: Add is_opening_balance method.
2020-04-08 19:04:25 +00:00
@pytest.mark.parametrize('acct_name,expected', [
('Assets:Cash', False),
('Assets:Prepaid:Expenses', False),
('Assets:Receivable:Accounts', False),
('Expenses:Other', False),
('Equity:Funds:Restricted', True),
('Equity:Funds:Unrestricted', True),
('Equity:OpeningBalance', True),
('Equity:Retained:Costs', False),
('Income:Other', False),
('Liabilities:CreditCard', False),
('Liabilities:Payable:Accounts', False),
('Liabilities:UnearnedIncome:Donations', False),
])
def test_is_opening_equity(acct_name, expected):
assert data.Account(acct_name).is_opening_equity() == expected
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink