Correct and integrate this pasted paragraph.
Upon closer inspection, this pasted paragraph contained a clear error: as written. Specifically, it stated that compliance was automatic if you merely "pass along" the CCS received from upstream. It's IOTTMCO that this is wrong. I've corrected it and integrated the text.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e24942c98b
commit
fed5eac075
1 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -1302,12 +1302,12 @@ burden of the vendor's inattention to GPL compliance. Ask the right
|
|||
questions, demand an account of your vendors' compliance procedures, and
|
||||
seek indemnity from them.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME-URGENT: integrate
|
||||
|
||||
In such instances it is advisable that you exercise your own rights as a user
|
||||
to request C\&CS for all the GPL programs that your suppliers provided to you,
|
||||
preferably in an automated process. Once you receive such C\&CS, passing it
|
||||
along with your product will ensure your compliance with the license.
|
||||
In particular, any time your vendor incorporates copylefted software, you
|
||||
\textit{must} exercise your own rights as a user to request CCS for all the
|
||||
copylefted programs that your suppliers provided to you. Furthermore, you
|
||||
must ensure that CCS is correct and adequate yourself. Good vendors should
|
||||
help you do this, and make it easy. If those vendors cannot, pick a
|
||||
different vendor before proceeding with the product.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME-URGENT: Needs a new section
|
||||
% \section{Mergers and Acquisitions}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue