Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

have/having

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
donaldr3 2014-03-21 16:32:55 -04:00
parent 7ce3980bd6
commit fd3be34dc4
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ program, Oscar. About 30\% of Oscar was literally the same code as
that in Adapter. After the suit began, the defendant rewrote those that in Adapter. After the suit began, the defendant rewrote those
portions of Oscar that contained Adapter code in order to produce a new portions of Oscar that contained Adapter code in order to produce a new
version of Oscar that was functionally competitive with Adapter, without version of Oscar that was functionally competitive with Adapter, without
have any literal copies of its code. Feeling slighted still, the having any literal copies of its code. Feeling slighted still, the
plaintiff alleged that even the second version of Oscar, despite having no plaintiff alleged that even the second version of Oscar, despite having no
literally copied code, also infringed its copyrights. In addressing that literally copied code, also infringed its copyrights. In addressing that
question, the Second Circuit promulgated the AFC test. question, the Second Circuit promulgated the AFC test.