Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Minor wordsmithing in the freedom to share improvements.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bradley M. Kuhn 2014-03-15 12:57:05 -04:00
parent e6ee7fa2b9
commit f58d197fe1
1 changed files with 18 additions and 18 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

36
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -265,39 +265,39 @@ share commercially.)
\subsection{The Freedom to Share Improvements}
The freedom to modify and improve is somewhat empty without the freedom to
share those improvements. The Free Software community is built on the
share those improvements. The Software freedom community is built on the
pillar of altruistic sharing of improved Free Software. Inevitably, a
Free Software project sprouts a mailing list where improvements are shared
freely among members of the development community. Such noncommercial
sharing must be permitted for Free Software to thrive.
freely among members of the development community. Such noncommercial
sharing is the primary reason that Free Software thrives.
Commercial sharing of modified Free Software is equally important.
For commercial support to exist in a competitive free market, all
developers --- from single-person contractors to large software
companies --- must have the freedom to market their services as
improvers of Free Software. All forms of such service marketing must
developers -- from single-person contractors to large software
companies -- must have the freedom to market their services as
improvers of Free Software. All forms of such service marketing must
be equally available to all.
For example, selling support services for Free Software is fully
permitted. Companies and individuals can offer themselves as ``the place
to call'' when software fails or does not function properly. For such a
service to be meaningful, the entity offering that service must have the
to call'' when software fails or does not function properly. For such a
service to be meaningful, the entity offering that service needs the
right to modify and improve the software for the customer to correct any
problems that are beyond mere user error.
Entities must also be permitted to make available modified versions of
Free Software. Most Free Software programs have a ``standard version''
that is made available from the primary developers of the software.
However, all who have the software have the ``freedom to fork'' --- that
is, make available nontrivial modified versions of the software on a
permanent or semi-permanent basis. Such freedom is central to vibrant
developer and user interaction.
Software freedom licenses also permit any entity to distribute modified
versions of Free Software. Most Free Software programs have a ``standard
version'' that is made available from the primary developers of the software.
However, all who have the software have the ``freedom to fork'' -- that is,
make available nontrivial modified versions of the software on a permanent or
semi-permanent basis. Such freedom is central to vibrant developer and user
interaction.
Companies and individuals have the right to make true value-added versions
of Free Software. They may use freedom to share improvements to
of Free Software. They may use freedom to share improvements to
distribute distinct versions of Free Software with different functionality
and features. Furthermore, this freedom can be exercised to serve a
disenfranchised subset of the user community. If the developers of the
and features. Furthermore, this freedom can be exercised to serve a
disenfranchised subset of the user community. If the developers of the
standard version refuse to serve the needs of some of the software's
users, other entities have the right to create a long- or short-lived fork
to serve that sub-community.