Copyleft/guide
6
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

multiple copy edits

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
donaldr3 2014-03-21 16:55:06 -04:00
parent 4753f14a82
commit f167d0387a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gpl-lgpl.tex
View file

@ -1621,7 +1621,7 @@ programs under any license. Despite what you hear from its critics, the
GPL is nothing like a virus, not only because the GPL is good for you and
a virus is bad for you, but also because simple contact with a GPL'd
code-base does not impact the license of other programs. A programmer must
expended actual effort to cause a work to fall under the terms
expend actual effort to cause a work to fall under the terms
of the GPL. Redistributors are always welcome to simply ship GPL'd
software alongside proprietary software or other unrelated Free Software,
as long as the terms of GPL are adhered to for those packages that are
@ -1633,7 +1633,7 @@ truly GPL'd.
Software is a strange beast when compared to other copyrightable works.
It is currently impossible to make a film or a book that can be truly
obscured. Ultimately, the full text of a novel, even one written by
William Faulkner, must presented to the reader as words in some
William Faulkner, must be presented to the reader as words in some
human-readable language so that they can enjoy the work. A film, even one
directed by David Lynch, must be perceptible by human eyes and ears to
have any value.