Wordsmith and typo fixes.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									fcec57fe6d
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						e893d9d782
					
				
					 1 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										14
									
								
								gpl-lgpl.tex
									
										
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										14
									
								
								gpl-lgpl.tex
									
										
									
									
									
								
							|  | @ -1967,26 +1967,26 @@ formal agreement between the licensee and the software distributor to be | |||
| valid. This has led to mechanisms like ``shrink-wrap'' and ``click-wrap'' | ||||
| as mechanisms to perform acceptance ceremonies with EULAs. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| The GPL does not need contract law to ``transfer rights.''  No rights | ||||
| are transfered between parties. By contrast, the GPL is a permission | ||||
| The GPL does not need contract law to ``transfer rights.''  Usually, no rights | ||||
| are transfered between parties.  By contrast, the GPL is primarily a permission | ||||
| slip to undertake activities that would otherwise have been prohibited | ||||
| by copyright law. As such, it needs no acceptance ceremony; the | ||||
| by copyright law.  As such, GPL needs no acceptance ceremony; the | ||||
| licensee is not even required to accept the license. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| However, without the GPL, the activities of copying, modifying and | ||||
| distributing the software would have otherwise been prohibited. So, the | ||||
| distributing the software would have otherwise been prohibited.  So, the | ||||
| GPL says that you only accepted the license by undertaking activities that | ||||
| you would have otherwise been prohibited without your license under GPL\@. | ||||
| This is a certainly subtle point, and requires a mindset quite different | ||||
| from the contractual approach taken by EULA authors. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| An interesting side benefit to GPLv2~\S5 is that the bulk of users of Free | ||||
| Software are not required to accept the license. Undertaking fair and | ||||
| Software are not required to accept the license.  Undertaking fair and | ||||
| unregulated use of the work, for example, does not bind you to the GPL, | ||||
| since you are not engaging in activity that is otherwise controlled by | ||||
| copyright law. Only when you engage in those activities that might have an | ||||
| copyright law.  Only when you engage in those activities that might have an | ||||
| impact on the freedom of others does license acceptance occur, and the | ||||
| terms begin to bind you to fair and equitable sharing of the software. In | ||||
| terms begin to bind you to fair and equitable sharing of the software.  In | ||||
| other words, the GPL only kicks in when it needs to for the sake of | ||||
| freedom. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Bradley M. Kuhn
						Bradley M. Kuhn