Investigate USA-specific-ness of "derivative work"
This FIXME is to remind me to look into this issue later.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									2f2e5f9e4c
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						be62a9b765
					
				
					 1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		|  | @ -2364,6 +2364,11 @@ GPLv2: ``modify'' ``covered work'', ``propagate'', ``convey'', and | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
| \subsection{Modify and the Work Based on the Program} | \subsection{Modify and the Work Based on the Program} | ||||||
| 
 | 
 | ||||||
|  | %  FIXME: I think we actually need to research the claim below that | ||||||
|  | %  ``derivative work'' as a term is unique to USA copyright law.  I have | ||||||
|  | %  heard German lawyers, for example, use the term extensively.  Is it also a | ||||||
|  | %  term perhaps under German law?  -- bkuhn | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
| GPLv2 included a defined term, ``work based on the Program'', but also used | GPLv2 included a defined term, ``work based on the Program'', but also used | ||||||
| the term ``modify'' and ``based on'' throughout the license.  GPLv2's ``work | the term ``modify'' and ``based on'' throughout the license.  GPLv2's ``work | ||||||
| based on the Program'' definition made use of a legal term of art, | based on the Program'' definition made use of a legal term of art, | ||||||
|  |  | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Bradley M. Kuhn
						Bradley M. Kuhn