Investigate USA-specific-ness of "derivative work"
This FIXME is to remind me to look into this issue later.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f2e5f9e4c
commit
be62a9b765
1 changed files with 5 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -2364,6 +2364,11 @@ GPLv2: ``modify'' ``covered work'', ``propagate'', ``convey'', and
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\subsection{Modify and the Work Based on the Program}
|
\subsection{Modify and the Work Based on the Program}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
% FIXME: I think we actually need to research the claim below that
|
||||||
|
% ``derivative work'' as a term is unique to USA copyright law. I have
|
||||||
|
% heard German lawyers, for example, use the term extensively. Is it also a
|
||||||
|
% term perhaps under German law? -- bkuhn
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
GPLv2 included a defined term, ``work based on the Program'', but also used
|
GPLv2 included a defined term, ``work based on the Program'', but also used
|
||||||
the term ``modify'' and ``based on'' throughout the license. GPLv2's ``work
|
the term ``modify'' and ``based on'' throughout the license. GPLv2's ``work
|
||||||
based on the Program'' definition made use of a legal term of art,
|
based on the Program'' definition made use of a legal term of art,
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue