Begin section on non-copyright issues, focusing first on patents.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b2fadd383c
commit
b15c4c2a24
1 changed files with 30 additions and 1 deletions
31
gpl-lgpl.tex
31
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -455,6 +455,34 @@ concept behind copyleft, but to actually make it work in the real world, a
|
|||
true implementation in legal text must exist. The GPL is the primary
|
||||
implementation of copyleft in copyright licensing language.
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Software and Non-Copyright Legal Regimes}
|
||||
\label{software-and-non-copyright}
|
||||
|
||||
The use, modification and distribution of software, like many endeavors,
|
||||
simultaneously interacts with multiple different legal regimes. As was noted
|
||||
early via footnotes, copyright is merely the \textit{most common way} to
|
||||
restrict users' rights to copy, share, modify and/or redistribute software.
|
||||
However, proprietary software licenses typically use every mechanism
|
||||
available to subjugate users. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\item Unfortunately, despite much effort by many in the software freedom
|
||||
community to end patents that read on software (i.e., patents on
|
||||
computational ideas), they still ultimately exist. As such, a software
|
||||
program might otherwise be seemly unrestricted, but a patent might read on
|
||||
the software and ruin everything for its users.\footnote{See
|
||||
\S\S~\ref{gpl-implied-patent-grant},~\ref{GPLs7},~\ref{GPLv3s11} for more
|
||||
discussion on how the patent system interacts with copyleft, and read
|
||||
Richard M.~Stallman's essay,
|
||||
\href{http://www.wired.com/opinion/2012/11/richard-stallman-software-patents/}{\textit{Let’s
|
||||
Limit the Effect of Software Patents, Since We Can’t Eliminate Them}}
|
||||
for more information on the problems these patents present to society.}
|
||||
|
||||
\item
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\subsection{Non-USA Copyright Regimes}
|
||||
\label{non-usa-copyright}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1463,6 +1491,7 @@ only rarely a better option than complying via \S 3(a).
|
|||
|
||||
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|
||||
\chapter{GPL's Implied Patent Grant}
|
||||
\label{gpl-implied-patent-grant}
|
||||
|
||||
We digress again briefly from our section-by-section consideration of GPLv2
|
||||
to consider the interaction between the terms of GPL and patent law. The
|
||||
|
@ -1859,7 +1888,7 @@ So end the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License.
|
|||
\section{GPLv3 \S 10: Explicit Downstream License}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{GPLv3 \S 11: Explicit Patent Licensing}
|
||||
|
||||
\label{GPLv3s11}
|
||||
\section{GPLv3 \S 12: Familiar as GPLv2 \S 7}
|
||||
|
||||
\section{GPLv3 \S 13: The Great Affero Compromise}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue