Fontana noted that I edited this poorly the first time,
likely due in my haste to make a funny commit message: <fontana> bkuhn: I think there's an editing problem in that change <bkuhn> fontana: I was showing you the commit message more than the content <bkuhn> are you saying I made an editing erro[r]? <fontana> yes
This commit is contained in:
parent
b17d0710ac
commit
aa15f936ce
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
10
gpl-lgpl.tex
10
gpl-lgpl.tex
|
@ -2949,12 +2949,10 @@ While imposing technical barriers to modification is wrong regardless of
|
|||
circumstances, the areas where restricted devices are of the greatest
|
||||
practical concern today fall within the User Product definition. Most, if
|
||||
not all, technically-restricted devices running GPL-covered programs are
|
||||
consumer electronics devices, and that has remained true since GPLv3's
|
||||
release. Moreover, the disparity in clout between the manufacturers and
|
||||
these users makes it difficult for the users to reject technical restrictions
|
||||
through their weak and unorganized market power. Even limited to User
|
||||
Products, the provision addresses the fundamental problem. Therefore, the
|
||||
technical restrictions provisions to User Products.
|
||||
consumer electronics devices. Moreover, the disparity in clout between the
|
||||
manufacturers and these users makes it difficult for the users to reject
|
||||
technical restrictions through their weak and unorganized market power. Even
|
||||
limited to User Products, this provision addresses the fundamental problem.
|
||||
|
||||
% FIXME-LATER: link \href to USC 2301
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue