Removed some specific company names from here, particularly because the
information is somewhat out of date.
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									8e5a381028
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						a7ffbb9ee5
					
				
					 1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										11
									
								
								gpl-lgpl.tex
									
										
									
									
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										11
									
								
								gpl-lgpl.tex
									
										
									
									
									
								
							|  | @ -4238,8 +4238,8 @@ equivalents. | |||
| Using Free Software in house is certainly helpful, but a thriving | ||||
| market for Free Software-oriented business models also exists. There is the | ||||
| traditional model of selling copies of Free Software distributions. | ||||
| Many companies, including IBM and Red Hat, make substantial revenue | ||||
| from this model. IBM primarily chooses this model because they have | ||||
| Many companies make substantial revenue | ||||
| from this model. Some choose this model because they have | ||||
| found that for higher-end hardware, the cost of the profit made from | ||||
| proprietary software licensing fees is negligible. The real profit is | ||||
| in the hardware, but it is essential that software be stable, reliable | ||||
|  | @ -4248,7 +4248,7 @@ it. Free Software, and GPL'd software in particular (because IBM can | |||
| be assured that proprietary versions of the same software will not | ||||
| exists to compete on their hardware) is the right choice. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Red Hat has actually found that a ``convenience fee'' for Free Software, | ||||
| For example, charging a ``convenience fee'' for Free Software, | ||||
| when set at a reasonable price (around \$60 or so), can produce some | ||||
| profit. Even though Red Hat's system is fully downloadable on their | ||||
| Web site, people still go to local computer stores and buy copies of their | ||||
|  | @ -4268,8 +4268,7 @@ for GCC --- mostly consisting of new ports of GCC to different or new, | |||
| embedded targets. Eventually, Cygnus was so successful that | ||||
| it was purchased by Red Hat where it remains a profitable division. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| However, there are very small companies like CodeSourcery, as well as | ||||
| other medium-sized companies like MontaVista and OpenTV that compete in | ||||
| However, there are very small companies that compete in | ||||
| this space. Because the code-base is protect by GPL, it creates and | ||||
| demands industry trust. Companies can cooperate on the software and | ||||
| improve it for everyone. Meanwhile, companies who rely on GCC for their | ||||
|  | @ -4288,7 +4287,7 @@ discussed earlier in this tutorial, a copyright holder is permitted under | |||
| copyright law to license a software system under her copyright as many | ||||
| different ways as she likes to as many different parties as she wishes. | ||||
| 
 | ||||
| Some companies, such as Oracle, use this to their | ||||
| Some companies use this to their | ||||
| financial advantage with regard to a GPL'd code base. The standard | ||||
| version is available from the company under the terms of the GPL\@. | ||||
| However, parties can purchase separate proprietary software licensing for | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		
		Reference in a new issue
	
	 Bradley M. Kuhn
						Bradley M. Kuhn